Debian Developers - Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > November 2006 > Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
Mike Hommey

2006-11-07, 1:30 am

On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:01:27AM -0800, Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> wrote:
> Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:
>
>
>
> It's in widespread use in both Debian scripts and in upstream scripts.
> When we tried to warn about this behavior in lintian, it turned up
> hundreds of packages and we got a lot of objections to the check on the
> grounds that dash supports this construct and the only shell that doesn't
> is posh. It seemed like the general consensus was that requiring that all
> those scripts be modified to require bash was more trouble than it was
> worth.


Well we got bug reports for that on firefox, IIRC, and we changed it,
that was not a real problem to replace [ some != test -a other = test ]
with [ some != test ] && [ other = test ]...

Mike


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com