Debian Developers - Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > November 2006 > Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Proposed new POSIX sh policy
Russ Allbery

2006-11-07, 1:31 am

Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> writes:

> Well we got bug reports for that on firefox, IIRC, and we changed it,
> that was not a real problem to replace [ some != test -a other = test ]
> with [ some != test ] && [ other = test ]...


Yes, a lot of people did fix it, but I'm afraid there are still a lot
left. We can remove the requirement, but my understanding is that dash
supports it, which means that it's probably not creating bugs in practice
(posh isn't really designed for use as anything other than a test suite,
as I understand it).

However, if my assumptions above are wrong, I'm happy to revisit this. I
do think that it's still better to avoid test -a and test -o, and lintian
does still warn about this at the info level (-I).

--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com