Debian Developers - Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > July 2006 > Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: RFC: ssl-cert2 design [Was: Re: Using the SSL snakeoil certificate]
Lars Wirzenius

2006-07-28, 7:29 am

pe, 2006-07-28 kello 10:53 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
> On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
> Why does this concern you? I thought debhelper was fairly standard use
> today.


I don't like it when people make using helper packages de facto
required. And debhelper isn't standard (meaning that you can expect
everyone to use it), merely very common. It is also very good, but its
use must still remain optional.

> But, yes, like all of debhelper it's just a convenience wrapper. If your
> package is very simple then in the postinst add


Good. If that is documented in the ssl-cert2 package, then all is well.

--
The most difficult thing in programming is to be simple and
straightforward.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com