Debian Developers - renaming network interfaces in udev

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > July 2006 > renaming network interfaces in udev





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author renaming network interfaces in udev
Brian May

2006-07-30, 1:22 pm

Hello,

For some reason I thought it was considered bad to rename eth* to eth* using
udev (race conditions and such).

However, after upgrading my systems to etch, I notice they do just this,
by default:

--- cut ---
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
# program, probably run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single line.

# UNKNOWN device (/class/net/eth0)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVER=="?*", SYSFS{address}=="00:0b:2f:4e:31:65", NAME="eth0"

# UNKNOWN device (/class/net/eth1)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVER=="?*", SYSFS{address}=="00:0b:2f:6d:19:2b", NAME="eth1"

# UNKNOWN device (/class/net/eth2)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", DRIVER=="?*", SYSFS{address}=="00:11:06:00:00:00:4b:2f", NAME="eth2"
--- cut ---

Where eth0 is the only real network card on this system.

Unfortunately the above rules broke, and I ended up with eth0 being
not accessible. I only had eth0, and it wasn't the correct device.

I ended up renaming eth* in the above to net* and it works.

So I am really puzzled that the above is the default, because I
thought it was previously mentioned in this mailing list that you
cannot do the above due to race conditions or something.

Comments???

Although my system is working fine, I still get the following message on startup (at least last time I looked):

udevd_event: rename_net_if: error changing net interface name eth1_temp to eth0: timeout

which seems really confusing, IMHO.

Thanks for any advice.

Brian May


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Marco d'Itri

2006-07-30, 1:22 pm

On Jul 30, Brian May <bam@debian.org> wrote:

> For some reason I thought it was considered bad to rename eth* to eth* using
> udev (race conditions and such).

This was before 0.084-4.

> # UNKNOWN device (/class/net/eth0)

Interesting, can you try to debug why this happens?
It's only cosmetic, but unusual.

> Where eth0 is the only real network card on this system.

I think we can be positively sure that write_net_rules did not invent
these MAC addresses by itself, so if it created rules for eth0 and eth1
with two different MAC addresses there has to be a reason.
eth2 looks like a firewire interface.

> Unfortunately the above rules broke, and I ended up with eth0 being
> not accessible. I only had eth0, and it wasn't the correct device.

So I suppose that your current ethernet card was 00:0b:2f:6d:19:2b and
it was renamed to eth1?

> Comments???

Just asking the maintainer works too, I am not sure if this is a topic of
general interest. Send mail or look for me on IRC if you need more help.

--
ciao,
Marco

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com