I am using Oracle 9.2.0.1 on IBM AIX 5.1L System.

I am wondering if there is any latest version (like 9.2.0.2 or
9.2.0.3) released by Oracle ...and if so what are the steps to upgrade
to this new version....?

Any related information on this is appreciated.

THANKS!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hari Om wrote:
quote:

> I am using Oracle 9.2.0.1 on IBM AIX 5.1L System.
>
> I am wondering if there is any latest version (like 9.2.0.2 or
> 9.2.0.3) released by Oracle ...and if so what are the steps to upgrade
> to this new version....?
>
> Any related information on this is appreciated.

 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^
check metalink

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

> I am wondering if there is any latest version (like 9.2.0.2 or
quote:

> 9.2.0.3) released by Oracle ...and if so what are the steps to upgrade
> to this new version....?


The 9.2.0.4 patchset should be out. You will need to access Metalink to
download the patchset. When you download the patchset, you will also get
the instructions you need to install it.

HTH,
Brian

--
 ========================================
===========================

Brian Peasland
dba@remove_spam.peasland.com

Remove the "remove_spam." from the email address to email me.


"I can give it to you cheap, quick, and good. Now pick two out of
the three"

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hari Om wrote:
quote:

> I am using Oracle 9.2.0.1 on IBM AIX 5.1L System.
>
> I am wondering if there is any latest version (like 9.2.0.2 or
> 9.2.0.3) released by Oracle ...and if so what are the steps to upgrade
> to this new version....?
>
> Any related information on this is appreciated.
>
> THANKS!


9.2.0.4 has been out for a long time. There are rumors of a 9.2.0.5
coming too.

--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/...oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/...aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

9205 scheduled v.soon now. There are some sneaky introduced ones in 9204
that are hopefully included.
"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan@x.washington.edu> wrote in message
news:1075394075.307492@yasure...
quote:

> Hari Om wrote:
> 
>
> 9.2.0.4 has been out for a long time. There are rumors of a 9.2.0.5
> coming too.
>
> --
> Daniel Morgan
> http://www.outreach.washington.edu/...oad/oad_crs.asp
> http://www.outreach.washington.edu/...aoa/aoa_crs.asp
> damorgan@x.washington.edu
> (replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 08:35:37 -0800, Daniel Morgan <damorgan@x.washington.edu
>
wrote:
quote:

>9.2.0.4 has been out for a long time. There are rumors of a 9.2.0.5
>coming too.


More than a rumour hopefully - we've been promised that some bugs we're
hitting are fixed in 9.2.0.5.

--
Andy Hassall <andy@andyh.co.uk> / Space: disk usage analysis tool
<http://www.andyh.co.uk> / <http://www.andyhsoftware.co.uk/space>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Bricklen <bricklen-rem@yahoo.comz> wrote in message news:<XV9Sb.28350$5D.4538@clgrps13>...
quote:
[
color=darkred]
> Hari Om wrote:
> 
>     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^
> check metalink[/color]


Metalink is not always internally consistent on this subject.
However, if you can find the download, there is usually a readme
available there so you don't have to download to read it.  The
downloads are usually on otn.oracle.com.  Click download --> Oracle 9i
database --> Look for your platform.  If you don't see it, harass OTN.
Check download daily.  Check out
http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink...T&p_id=245758.1
, it shows bugs fixed on AIX for 9.2.0.4.  Check out the metalink
compatibility matrix, it shows 9.2.0.4 as certified.

Then click on patches on metalink and flounder about until you find
your platform:

[I was going to paste a link to it here, until I noticed it put my
email and userid in the link!]  This might work:
http://updates.oracle.com/ARULink/P...=212&language=0

Stupid Java code on quick links database link truncates hover
drop-down depending on where the browser window is scrolled to.  LOL!

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
Well, Howdy Doody!  Clarabell kicks the bucket:
http://www.tvland.com/obits/kangaroo/

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"Telemachus" <Zaka@twibbles.99.net> wrote in message news:<FlcSb.673$rb.52492@news.indigo.ie>...[Q
UOTE]
> 9205 scheduled v.soon now. There are some sneaky introduced ones in 9204
> that are hopefully included.
> "Daniel Morgan" <damorgan@x.washington.edu> wrote in message
> news:1075394075.307492@yasure... 

opinion ...

I wish that they'd issue an 8.1.7.5.x with all of the security alerts
rolled into it, plus large memory support for win32, cursor_sharing
bugs fixed.
They pushed back de-support for a year, they should have also merged
all of the .6 -.12 patchsets into a real one.

Pd

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Andy Hassall <andy@andyh.co.uk> wrote in message news:<guti101l4dr78q2i7k1igd0mhge6akvcnn@4ax.com>
..
quote:

> On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 08:35:37 -0800, Daniel Morgan <damorgan@x.washington.e
du>
> wrote:
> 
>
>  More than a rumour hopefully - we've been promised that some bugs we're
> hitting are fixed in 9.2.0.5.


I know about several bugs that got a patch for 9.2.0.4. So maybe these
ones will be merged (together with others still unknown) to 9.2.0.5
patchset. Is true that even in 9.2.0.4 there are few stupid bugs
included in.

--
Dusan Bolek

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Dusan Bolek wrote:
quote:

> Andy Hassall <andy@andyh.co.uk> wrote in message news:<guti101l4dr78q2i7k1
igd0mhge6akvcnn@4ax.com>...
> 
>
>
> I know about several bugs that got a patch for 9.2.0.4. So maybe these
> ones will be merged (together with others still unknown) to 9.2.0.5
> patchset. Is true that even in 9.2.0.4 there are few stupid bugs
> included in.
>
> --
> Dusan Bolek


If doing RAC ... there are quite a few things 9.2.0.4 doesn't do ... not
just well ... at all. A 9.2.0.5 install set that actually handles
secondary nodes properly is highly desirable.

So would finding the person that signed off on the 9.2.0.1 to 9.2.0.4 CD
set releases and claimed they had tested RAC installation. I'd
personally llike to help them to say: "Do you want fries with that."
There is no excuse for it ever getting out of QA unless someone was
faking the testing or performing the testing on machines still dirty
from previous installations.

--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/...oad/oad_crs.asp
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/...aoa/aoa_crs.asp
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]