I've been trying since FOREVER, but I can't get my orchestration to receive 
a
message using MSMQT.  it runs great if I receive it as a file drop, but I ge
t
this message when trying to send it to the Q:

MSMQT failed to publish the message coming into the queue
DIRECT=OS:jjjohnson\Private$\MyQueue, because no consumer was waiting for it
.

What does this mean???  Some on the web say that is in reality rejecting the
xml as invalid.  The same xml works fine as a file drop.

I can't seem to find any definitive tutorial on simply receiving a msg via
MSMQT.

All I want to do is this:

1.  A remote client sends a message to the Q.  The remote client is using
System.Messaging namespace, and is sending the message as string after
reading it from the file.

2. The orchestration receives the message from a receive port using the
MSMQT adapter and triggers the orchestration.

Sounds simple, but it has eluded me for several days.  What articles I have
found seem to indicate that MSMQT is used to guarantee the file gets dropped
in a folder, so that in the end I end up using a file drop to receive the xm
l
doc anyway.  This can't be right...

Please help because we have a major B2B integration to do.   We have an
existing WS endpoint that the partner calls.  The WS then drops xml docs in 
a
queue for processing by custom components.  We want to re-use this existing
endpoint, but let BizTalk perform the transformations and integration logic.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Do you actually have the receive location that is using MSMQT bound to an
orchestration that is started?

"Das Bose" <FakeAddress@No_where.net> wrote in message
news:45229B5E-01C2-4C9E-BC17-094D71E5BE96@microsoft.com...
> I've been trying since FOREVER, but I can't get my orchestration to
> receive a
> message using MSMQT.  it runs great if I receive it as a file drop, but I
> get
> this message when trying to send it to the Q:
>
> MSMQT failed to publish the message coming into the queue
> DIRECT=OS:jjjohnson\Private$\MyQueue, because no consumer was waiting for
> it.
>
> What does this mean???  Some on the web say that is in reality rejecting
> the
> xml as invalid.  The same xml works fine as a file drop.
>
> I can't seem to find any definitive tutorial on simply receiving a msg via
> MSMQT.
>
> All I want to do is this:
>
> 1.  A remote client sends a message to the Q.  The remote client is using
> System.Messaging namespace, and is sending the message as string after
> reading it from the file.
>
> 2. The orchestration receives the message from a receive port using the
> MSMQT adapter and triggers the orchestration.
>
> Sounds simple, but it has eluded me for several days.  What articles I
> have
> found seem to indicate that MSMQT is used to guarantee the file gets
> dropped
> in a folder, so that in the end I end up using a file drop to receive the
> xml
> doc anyway.  This can't be right...
>
> Please help because we have a major B2B integration to do.   We have an
> existing WS endpoint that the partner calls.  The WS then drops xml docs
> in a
> queue for processing by custom components.  We want to re-use this
> existing
> endpoint, but let BizTalk perform the transformations and integration
> logic.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Yes, it is bound.


"Scott Colestock" wrote:

> Do you actually have the receive location that is using MSMQT bound to an
> orchestration that is started?
>
> "Das Bose" <FakeAddress@No_where.net> wrote in message
> news:45229B5E-01C2-4C9E-BC17-094D71E5BE96@microsoft.com... 
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

I would use the subscription viewer to confirm that your orchestration is
actually subscribed in the way you expect...

"Das Bose" <FakeAddress@No_where.net> wrote in message
news:D3A4D007-ABDA-41C6-9651-88D5DA1AE748@microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Yes, it is bound.
>
>
> "Scott Colestock" wrote:
> 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

It sounds like your message is not getting identified correctly.  Are you 1)
using hte XML receive and 2) did you use the Submit Direct method as shown
in the SDK sample for messaging?

Matt


"Scott Colestock" <scolestock@nospam_usa.net> wrote in message
news:eLQyNX%23VFHA.2128@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>I would use the subscription viewer to confirm that your orchestration is
>actually subscribed in the way you expect...
>
> "Das Bose" <FakeAddress@No_where.net> wrote in message
> news:D3A4D007-ABDA-41C6-9651-88D5DA1AE748@microsoft.com... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]