[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...HON-54?page=all ]

Work on MODPYTHON-54 started by Nicolas Lehuen

> Add a way to import a published page into another published page
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MODPYTHON-54
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-54
>      Project: mod_python
>         Type: Improvement
>     Versions: 3.2.0
>     Reporter: Nicolas Lehuen
>     Assignee: Nicolas Lehuen
>      Fix For: 3.2.0

>
> Before mod_python 3.2, standard Python modules and published modules could
 be imported the same way, using apache.import_module. This had a number of 
disadvantages, leading to MODPYTHON-8, MODPYTHON-9, MODPYTHON-10, MODPYTHON-
11 and MODPYTHON-12.
> All these bugs were fixed by separating the published modules from the standard Py
thon module. apache.import_module can still be used to import standard modules, but 
published modules are now fully managed  by mod_python.publisher, and are not insert
ed
into sys.modules.
> The problem is that there is a use case of importing a published module fr
om another published module :
> /index.py----------------
> def index(req):
>     return "Hello, world !"
> def utility_function(foobar):
>     return foobar+1
> /other.py----------------
> import os
> directory = os.path.split(__file__)[0]
> other_index = apache.import_module("index",path=[directory])
> def index(req):
>     return "%s %i"%(other_index.index(req),other_index.utility_function(20
04))
> This was alread a bit of a hack in 3.1.4, but in 3.2 it does not really work the e
xpected way since the imported module (other_index in the example) is not the same m
odule as the one the publisher would use to publish /index.py. This could be trouble
som
e if the developer wanted to share some data between the modules, e.g. a cache or a connecti
on pool, but not if he only wanted to share some code.
> Therefore, we need to provide a clean API in mod_python.publisher to allow develop
ers to reference another published module.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]