Hi,

Are there any known issues with running MCMS 2001 and MCMS 2002 on the same
server?

Regards,
John

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi John,

that is not possbile as both products use the same COM objects but with
different versions.

Cheers,
Stefan

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights

New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
----------------------


"John" <john@netaffil.com> wrote in message
news:eskCNmEXFHA.1508@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> Are there any known issues with running MCMS 2001 and MCMS 2002 on the
> same server?
>
> Regards,
> John
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi John,

Why do you want to run MCMS 2001 and 2002 on the same box?

Could you not run MCMS 2002 with ASP & ASP.NET templates enabled.

Regards
--
 ________________________________________


Angus Logan  (MCAD/MCDBA/MCP/MVP for MCMS)
Product Specialist
Microsoft Application Solutions
Data#3 Limited
E angus_logan@data3.com.au
BLOG www.anguslogan.com
 ________________________________________

"John" <john@netaffil.com> wrote in message
news:eskCNmEXFHA.1508@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> Are there any known issues with running MCMS 2001 and MCMS 2002 on the
> same server?
>
> Regards,
> John
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Angus,

I have to admit that I don't know a lot about neither MCMS 2001 or MCMS 2002
with ASP templates. This situation is that an existing solution exists based
on MCMS 2001. Now a new solution is planned and this should be based on the
newest version, MCMS 2002.

In order for these solutions to run on the same box I guess I have to
upgrade the MCMS 2001 solution to a MCMS 2002 ASP solution. I assume that,
of course depending on the hardware needed, it would be less expensive to
buy a new box for the new solution than to upgrade the existing solution. Am
I on the wrong track here or..?

Regards,
John

"Angus Logan [MVP]" <angus_logan@data3.com.au> wrote in message
news:OxhRy4EXFHA.3140@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Hi John,
>
> Why do you want to run MCMS 2001 and 2002 on the same box?
>
> Could you not run MCMS 2002 with ASP & ASP.NET templates enabled.
>
> Regards
> --
>  ________________________________________

>
> Angus Logan  (MCAD/MCDBA/MCP/MVP for MCMS)
> Product Specialist
> Microsoft Application Solutions
> Data#3 Limited
> E angus_logan@data3.com.au
> BLOG www.anguslogan.com
>  ________________________________________

> "John" <john@netaffil.com> wrote in message
> news:eskCNmEXFHA.1508@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi John,

You should be able to just upgrade the existing solution to run on MCMS 2002
(with minimal coding effort; but i but of user education effort).

Regards

--
 ________________________________________


Angus Logan  (MCAD/MCDBA/MCP/MVP for MCMS)
Product Specialist
Microsoft Application Solutions
Data#3 Limited
E angus_logan@data3.com.au
BLOG www.anguslogan.com
 ________________________________________

"John" <john@netaffil.com> wrote in message
news:ecOB2AFXFHA.3348@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Hi Angus,
>
> I have to admit that I don't know a lot about neither MCMS 2001 or MCMS
> 2002 with ASP templates. This situation is that an existing solution
> exists based on MCMS 2001. Now a new solution is planned and this should
> be based on the newest version, MCMS 2002.
>
> In order for these solutions to run on the same box I guess I have to
> upgrade the MCMS 2001 solution to a MCMS 2002 ASP solution. I assume that,
> of course depending on the hardware needed, it would be less expensive to
> buy a new box for the new solution than to upgrade the existing solution.
> Am I on the wrong track here or..?
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> "Angus Logan [MVP]" <angus_logan@data3.com.au> wrote in message
> news:OxhRy4EXFHA.3140@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Oops I got tongue tied.


You should be able to just upgrade the existing solution to run on MCMS 2002
(with minimal coding effort; but with some user education becuase Site
Builder is gone.).

--
 ________________________________________


Angus Logan  (MCAD/MCDBA/MCP/MVP for MCMS)
Product Specialist
Microsoft Application Solutions
Data#3 Limited
E angus_logan@data3.com.au
BLOG www.anguslogan.com
 ________________________________________

"Angus Logan [MVP]" <angus_logan@data3.com.au> wrote in message
news:%23wLgKiFXFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Hi John,
>
> You should be able to just upgrade the existing solution to run on MCMS
> 2002 (with minimal coding effort; but i but of user education effort).
>
> Regards
>
> --
>  ________________________________________

>
> Angus Logan  (MCAD/MCDBA/MCP/MVP for MCMS)
> Product Specialist
> Microsoft Application Solutions
> Data#3 Limited
> E angus_logan@data3.com.au
> BLOG www.anguslogan.com
>  ________________________________________

> "John" <john@netaffil.com> wrote in message
> news:ecOB2AFXFHA.3348@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Angus,

Thanks for the information. I will look into this option.

/John

"Angus Logan [MVP]" <angus_logan@data3.com.au> wrote in message
news:e38t78FXFHA.2448@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Oops I got tongue tied.
>
>
> You should be able to just upgrade the existing solution to run on MCMS
> 2002
> (with minimal coding effort; but with some user education becuase Site
> Builder is gone.).
>
> --
>  ________________________________________

>
> Angus Logan  (MCAD/MCDBA/MCP/MVP for MCMS)
> Product Specialist
> Microsoft Application Solutions
> Data#3 Limited
> E angus_logan@data3.com.au
> BLOG www.anguslogan.com
>  ________________________________________

> "Angus Logan [MVP]" <angus_logan@data3.com.au> wrote in message
> news:%23wLgKiFXFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi John,

Please don't underestimate the effort involved in doing this. We hired some
consultants (some of the best apparently) for several weeks and they still
failed to upgrade one of our sites. It should be OK if all you want is a
fossilised version of the 2001 site running under 2002, but if you want to
continue developing the site there seems to be no alternative but to rewrite
it all using ASP.NET.

Kevin

"John" wrote:

> Hi Angus,
>
> Thanks for the information. I will look into this option.
>
> /John
>
> "Angus Logan [MVP]" <angus_logan@data3.com.au> wrote in message
> news:e38t78FXFHA.2448@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl... 
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Good point Kevin!

If you are upgrading an MCMS 2001 website to MCMS 2002 it can be done very
quickly using CMS.RAPID (www.cmsrapid.com) - check out their Developer web
cast as they give an overview of how to upgrade existing websites.

Regards
--
 ________________________________________


Angus Logan  (MCAD/MCDBA/MCP/MVP for MCMS)
Product Specialist
Microsoft Application Solutions
Data#3 Limited
E angus_logan@data3.com.au
BLOG www.anguslogan.com
 ________________________________________

"SC Kevin" <SCKevin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:88195F23-7217-4C62-AE59-6A4E5C23F75C@microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hi John,
>
> Please don't underestimate the effort involved in doing this. We hired
> some
> consultants (some of the best apparently) for several weeks and they still
> failed to upgrade one of our sites. It should be OK if all you want is a
> fossilised version of the 2001 site running under 2002, but if you want to
> continue developing the site there seems to be no alternative but to
> rewrite
> it all using ASP.NET.
>
> Kevin
>
> "John" wrote:
> 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Ha! Guess who the consultants were!

Cheers, Angus.

"Angus Logan [MVP]" wrote:

> Good point Kevin!
>
> If you are upgrading an MCMS 2001 website to MCMS 2002 it can be done very
> quickly using CMS.RAPID (www.cmsrapid.com) - check out their Developer web
> cast as they give an overview of how to upgrade existing websites.
>
> Regards
> --
>  ________________________________________

>
> Angus Logan  (MCAD/MCDBA/MCP/MVP for MCMS)
> Product Specialist
> Microsoft Application Solutions
> Data#3 Limited
> E angus_logan@data3.com.au
> BLOG www.anguslogan.com
>  ________________________________________

> "SC Kevin" <SCKevin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:88195F23-7217-4C62-AE59-6A4E5C23F75C@microsoft.com... 
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]