-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yesterday, during normal maintenance activity of the server
that runs the Winston Smith Project Antani anonymous
remailer,we found evidence of unauthorized hardware
manipulation.

This maintenance was programmed for an ISP change.

This is more than enough, of course, to take action as if
the server was compromised.

The Antani remailer is stopped, the keys are revoked, and
input queues that are waiting on the secondary SMTP will
soon be bounced back.

Remop private key was not compromised, and is still valid.

The remailer will remain down until the server is relocated
in a new, monitorable, environment. Details will follow.

Please remove Antani from stats and take all the necessary
countermeasures.

Good grief !

Antani admin.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

 iD8DBQFCwQRDqIOZDSyGL5cRAsxlAJ0YFnhVy9d1
LORoXwklZgNw2BJk1QCfaedM
chK6ivgoHGLQF40e3tDUMjE=
=5DEm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, "marcoc" <marcoc@dada.it> wrote:
>Yesterday, during normal maintenance activity of the server
>that runs the Winston Smith Project Antani anonymous
>remailer,we found evidence of unauthorized hardware
>manipulation.

First Paranoia remailer and now you. Is this some attack
by the Italian authorities on all remailers they can get
their hands on?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

At this time, the know facts can be explained that way.. and in simpler
way too, as (for example) a pending police investigation.

Just add your preferred quantity of paranoia ...

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In <ZNGKZVLJ38531.8536574074@reece.net.au>, thrasher@reece.net.au wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Jun 2005, "marcoc" <marcoc@dada.it> wrote: 
>
>First Paranoia remailer and now you. Is this some attack
>by the Italian authorities on all remailers they can get
>their hands on?

I dunno, but shure as shit I wish I had the time to run one myself.

-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In article <O8BWJWIL38532.3XXXXX9815@anonymous>
Anonymous <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote:

> I dunno, but shure as shit I wish I had the time to run one myself.

Time? My mixmaster remailer under Debian runs itself. I haven't
had[1] to tinker with anything in almost a year. Prior to that,
the Reliable remailer just needed a quick look at approximately
once a week, or if Windows crashed. Not quite as hands off, but
not bad.

It runs on an old IBM server that I picked up for less than $100
a couple of years ago on EBay.

[1] Although I haven't HAD to, I have tended to do a bit of
tinkering on occasion - to test mail2news servers and webmail,
etc. The remailer, though, would have run itself without my
intervention.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

 iQEVAwUBQsKM2oodg2SVfCwtAQGglgf7BSxCqZF1
CG/yDls9Pdcmi0eUxTnFmKbj
 mHrOlfkATS5vSlK0ePabkMdHrxklmOcu1hDAMJVs
MIALWtiqSg0kddki2YFv8T9w
 GPw7wQ+m1tP5gOhA9IfhWAFiKL5CR4XRhzs4Ctqd
J5xMxYdoNi+PnXgPxYnz4b4R
RSGFTjfV+r7nKsv2Y7+Y+a34Ac+XQm/c6ZId3EVr+E9l7jP7COQ8MnIlS9j4pPhz
 Ri9hBXKejmg+nvtRfKs3oZv09KrKjeb8Gz4DGBQm
dU3XNRKFucCDzr+fuXX1GELH
 hovPFjXn71T1kCb95B7++4kiuYYavmKy6d44cspn
FDgSIigMdU1hTA==
=VzFG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In <732baf550248f67a0186fae768f3bbfe@dizum.com>,
nobody@dizum.com wrote:
>In article <O8BWJWIL38532.3XXXXX9815@anonymous>
>Anonymous <BigappleRemailer@bigapple.yi.org> wrote:
> 
myself.[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>Time? My mixmaster remailer under Debian runs itself. I haven't
>had[1] to tinker with anything in almost a year. Prior to that,
>the Reliable remailer just needed a quick look at approximately
>once a week, or if Windows crashed. Not quite as hands off, but
>not bad.
>
>It runs on an old IBM server that I picked up for less than
$100
>a couple of years ago on EBay.
>
>[1] Although I haven't HAD to, I have tended to do a bit of
>tinkering on occasion - to test mail2news servers and webmail,
>etc. The remailer, though, would have run itself without my
>intervention.

As for me, I can manage the time easily enough, I just wish I
had another box and something faster than shared dialup to run
it on.



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.44

iD8DBQFCwv+jarc+oADstwoRAncvAJ4yM/The/TsS4GaATKHypAAlRoyQwCfaxWe
MklM4wMt0Srni1icdKjEmOA=
=XsXi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]