How are people packaging additions and changes to the Transaction and
Transaction Config objects in SQL?  Does Site Package pick up on new tables
and changes to existing tables or are people writing pre/post-packaging
scripts?  Are people using the Generic PUP object instead or using the
SiteCreate SDK sample?

Thanks,
Colin

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Colin,

If you follow the Commerce SDK it gives you the rescfg which allows you to
create fresh scripts for your resources. In our case, I've used that to
create custom resource definitons for my custom resources. I've even used
them to propogate the changed Order schemas across. For the transmeta data
you needent worry since the additions are records and the GenericPUP object
will package the data as part of the cab in the pup. The one thing you've to
be carefull about is that when you pack (using the UI) the data in your
custom resource schema also gets packed )

Even for packaging the Profile Resources I supplied the correct .sql file.
While unpacking the supplied file is used so all resources come out properly
.

"Colin Bowern" wrote:

> How are people packaging additions and changes to the Transaction and
> Transaction Config objects in SQL?  Does Site Package pick up on new table
s
> and changes to existing tables or are people writing pre/post-packaging
> scripts?  Are people using the Generic PUP object instead or using the
> SiteCreate SDK sample?
>
> Thanks,
> Colin
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]