Hi,

Is there anyway, where we can assign the work flows according to the users
on MCMS. Say, we have more than one group of authors for a site each group
having an editor. So, now, if an author creates a new posting, the posting
should be only visible to the editor of that particular group and only he
should be able to approve it.

Any ideas?

Thanks!!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Nanda,

usually different parts of a site have different authors and editors.
So create different author and editor rights groups for the different parts
of the site and then assign these rights groups to the appropriate parts of
the site.

Cheers,
Stefan

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights

New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
----------------------


"Nanda" <Nanda@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:DFB128DA-CD8F-4B83-917F-148C099B06AE@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
>
> Is there anyway, where we can assign the work flows according to the users
> on MCMS. Say, we have more than one group of authors for a site each group
> having an editor. So, now, if an author creates a new posting, the posting
> should be only visible to the editor of that particular group and only he
> should be able to approve it.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks!!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Thanks Stefan!

"Stefan [MSFT]" wrote:

> Hi Nanda,
>
> usually different parts of a site have different authors and editors.
> So create different author and editor rights groups for the different part
s
> of the site and then assign these rights groups to the appropriate parts o
f
> the site.
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
>
> New to MCMS?
> Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: [url]http://tinyurl.com/6zj44[/url
]
> ----------------------
>
>
> "Nanda" <Nanda@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:DFB128DA-CD8F-4B83-917F-148C099B06AE@microsoft.com... 
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]