Asking $37 shipped to the lower states

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:53:33 +0000, D.J. wrote:

> Asking $37 shipped to the lower states

CentOS and Whitebox are free, why would anyone give you a penny for an old
copy of RHEL since you can't transfer your service agreement to them?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

"General Schvantzkoph" <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.07.31.12.58.49.194932@yahoo.com...
> On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:53:33 +0000, D.J. wrote:
> 
>
> CentOS and Whitebox are free, why would anyone give you a penny for an old
> copy of RHEL since you can't transfer your service agreement to them?

The remaining service agreement, can be transferred and still supported by
Redhat. When initially released, the Redhat Professional Workstation cost
$123. What are CentOS and Whitebox? Sounds like leftovers from an old
gymshoe 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 17:25:35 +0000, D.J. wrote:

>
> "General Schvantzkoph" <schvantzkoph@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:pan.2005.07.31.12.58.49.194932@yahoo.com... 
>
> The remaining service agreement, can be transferred and still supported by
> Redhat. When initially released, the Redhat Professional Workstation cost
> $123.

What are CentOS and Whitebox? Sounds like leftovers from an old
> gymshoe 

They are free versions of RHEL. Centos and Whitebox are built from the
Redhat sources, the only difference between them and official RHEL is that
they've removed the Redhat logos. Centos is currently at RHEL 4.1 which is
the current release. You are trying to peddle an obsolete version of RHEL,
version 3, a version that was out of date the day Redhat shipped it
because they chose to use the 2.4 kernel rather than the 2.6 kernel which
was relatively new at the time.

You would be better off trying to sell our old gym shoes over the net then
trying to sell an outdated Linux distribution, nobody gives away new gym
shoes.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]