Hi,

I have a HTTP send port, that http posts messages to a service.

The message goes through sucessfuly, I do not care about the response
message, there is none, its a one way stream.

However I am seeing lots of messages stuck in HAT as Active in the SendPort,
they
are effictevley stopped, why are they still there? The message was
transmitted....

Snap shot from HAT:
HTTPSendPort
Messaging
Active
CD-DEV10
BizTalkMsgBoxDb
BizTalkServerApplication
27/07/2005 04:12:54 PM

HTTPSendPort
Messaging
Active
CD-DEV10
BizTalkMsgBoxDb
BizTalkServerApplication
27/07/2005 04:17:07 PM

HTTPSendPort
Messaging
Active
CD-DEV10
BizTalkMsgBoxDb
BizTalkServerApplication
27/07/2005 04:34:38 PM

HTTPSendPort
Messaging
Active
CD-DEV10
BizTalkMsgBoxDb
BizTalkServerApplication
27/07/2005 04:54:20 PM


Regards,

Paul

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Paul,

It almost looks as if these are retry events judging by the time period
between each (except the last). Even though your send port is "one-way", the
adapter is using a standard HTTP handshake and probably needs some sort of
response from your service.

Just a thought!

--
Jeff Lynch
"A BizTalk Enthusiast"
http://codebetter.com/blogs/jeff.lynch


"Paul Somers(MVP)" <paul@somers.com> wrote in message
news:ejoc8%231lFHA.3316@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> I have a HTTP send port, that http posts messages to a service.
>
> The message goes through sucessfuly, I do not care about the response
> message, there is none, its a one way stream.
>
> However I am seeing lots of messages stuck in HAT as Active in the
> SendPort, they
> are effictevley stopped, why are they still there? The message was
> transmitted....
>
> Snap shot from HAT:
>      HTTPSendPort
>     Messaging
>     Active
>     CD-DEV10
>     BizTalkMsgBoxDb
>     BizTalkServerApplication
>     27/07/2005 04:12:54 PM
>
>      HTTPSendPort
>     Messaging
>     Active
>     CD-DEV10
>     BizTalkMsgBoxDb
>     BizTalkServerApplication
>     27/07/2005 04:17:07 PM
>
>      HTTPSendPort
>     Messaging
>     Active
>     CD-DEV10
>     BizTalkMsgBoxDb
>     BizTalkServerApplication
>     27/07/2005 04:34:38 PM
>
>      HTTPSendPort
>     Messaging
>     Active
>     CD-DEV10
>     BizTalkMsgBoxDb
>     BizTalkServerApplication
>     27/07/2005 04:54:20 PM
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

I've seen similar behavior when interacting with a web server that didn't
complete the protocol with an HTTP 200, etc.

Scott Colestock

"Jeff Lynch" <jeff.lynch@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
news:uOC95l3lFHA.3140@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Paul,
>
> It almost looks as if these are retry events judging by the time period
> between each (except the last). Even though your send port is "one-way",
> the adapter is using a standard HTTP handshake and probably needs some
> sort of response from your service.
>
> Just a thought!
>
> --
> Jeff Lynch
> "A BizTalk Enthusiast"
> http://codebetter.com/blogs/jeff.lynch
>
>
> "Paul Somers(MVP)" <paul@somers.com> wrote in message
> news:ejoc8%231lFHA.3316@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

These are all single messages, I sent 4 messages, and they were all received
by the destination system. I have no control over the destination system
unfourtantley.

Paul.

"Jeff Lynch" <jeff.lynch@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
news:uOC95l3lFHA.3140@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Paul,
>
> It almost looks as if these are retry events judging by the time period
> between each (except the last). Even though your send port is "one-way",
> the adapter is using a standard HTTP handshake and probably needs some
> sort of response from your service.
>
> Just a thought!
>
> --
> Jeff Lynch
> "A BizTalk Enthusiast"
> http://codebetter.com/blogs/jeff.lynch
>
>
> "Paul Somers(MVP)" <paul@somers.com> wrote in message
> news:ejoc8%231lFHA.3316@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

If it does not complete with HTTP 200, the message should retry? It does not
in this case, it just sits doing nothing.

Paul.


"Scott Colestock" <scolestock@community.nospam> wrote in message
news:O4ytqE5lFHA.3780@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I've seen similar behavior when interacting with a web server that didn't
> complete the protocol with an HTTP 200, etc.
>
> Scott Colestock
>
> "Jeff Lynch" <jeff.lynch@newsgroup.nospam> wrote in message
> news:uOC95l3lFHA.3140@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Is there any small chance that you configured send port as solicit-response
instead of one-way?
(just guessing...)

Scott Colestock

"Paul Somers(MVP)" <paul@somers.com> wrote in message
news:OslLPMAmFHA.572@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> If it does not complete with HTTP 200, the message should retry? It does
> not in this case, it just sits doing nothing.
>
> Paul.
>
>
> "Scott Colestock" <scolestock@community.nospam> wrote in message
> news:O4ytqE5lFHA.3780@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Scott,

Unfourtantly its one way send, It all looks set up correctly, it just sits
there stuck, and i'd rather not try and go through in a live system and
clean these up. I'll have to PSS it 

Paul.


"Scott Colestock" <scolestock@community.nospam> wrote in message
news:O4clObDmFHA.2852@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Is there any small chance that you configured send port as
> solicit-response instead of one-way?
> (just guessing...)
>
> Scott Colestock
>
> "Paul Somers(MVP)" <paul@somers.com> wrote in message
> news:OslLPMAmFHA.572@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl... 
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]