08-08-05 07:51 AM
Has anyone considered that all these personal attacks/claims the
original is spam... is actually in itself spam, in exactly the same
way, actually Joe Bloggs down the street could subscribe by accident
and claim it's all spam because it's "un-wanted".
On 04/08/05, Anders Breindahl <skrewz@skrewz.dk> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 August 2005 02:16, Steve Langasek wrote:
the[vbcol=seagreen]
sage[vbcol=seagreen]
d[vbcol=seagreen]
>=20
> How does an XXXXXXX sound, anyway? (i.e. please avoid that word).
>=20
> Adam's right, as I see it. Bruce's mail didn't belong on -devel [0]. When=[/vb
col]
he[vbcol=seagreen]
> chose to post anyway, he didn't prefix his subject with OT:, and on top o=
f
> that, top-posts his answers [1]. Correct me, if any of this is wrong.
>=20
> As I see it, Bruce's posting to -devel should be considered harmless, but=
that
> does not change the fact that it didn't belong here. Job opportunities ar=
e
> not a technical development topic.
>=20
> What about creating a dd-contact(at)lists.debian.org-list, so outsiders h=
ave a
> channel of communication to the people who reads -devel?
>=20
> Regards, Anders Breindahl.
>=20
> [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel:
> Discussion about technical development topics.
> [1] Yes, I know that there is no homogeneous opinion on this. I found it =[/vb
col]
worth[vbcol=seagreen]
> mentioning.
>=20
>=20
>=20
--=20
N Jones
Proud Debian & FOSS User
Debian Maintainer of: html2ps, ipkungfu, dvorak7min & windowlab
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|