08-31-05 01:46 AM
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Zax <fleegle@bananasplit.info> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA512
>
>On 26 Aug 2005 18:22:54 -0000, BiKiKii Admin wrote in
>Message-Id: <2F5F5A5388D@bikikii.ath.cx>:
>
>
>Hi Bikikii
>Sorry for not responding to this sooner, was a busy weekend.
>
>I agree, your stats are actually more representitive of the remailer
>functionality than the other pingers which just accept what the
>remailers state as their functionality. So far as I know, the
>sub-flags are only there for informational purposes; I don't think
>clients ever select remailers based on the posting methodology, just on
>the fact they can post.
>
>I was having some conversations with Panta and Drsnoid recently
>regarding Post directives. The whole situation is a bit messy at the
>moment with some remailers falsely reporting their posting capabilities
>and others having dead mail2news gateways for their Nm methods. Then
>there's the mixmaster problem with dest-blocking mail2news gateways.
>Some remailers are also (apparently) dest-blocking mail2news gateways on
>purpose.
>
>I'll try and pull together some reports on these which might help
>improve the situation. It would be beneficial to users if they could
>use a Post directive for posting instead of hard-coding m2n gateways.
Excellent idea. Hope you guys get it together, that would be great. Thanks
for all the work you do.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|