Minumum/recommended J2SE version for Apache DS
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Web Servers reviews > Apache Server configuration support > Apache Directory Project > Minumum/recommended J2SE version for Apache DS




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Minumum/recommended J2SE version for Apache DS  
Stefan Zoerner


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
08-29-05 10:45 PM

Hi all!

Currently I finish the ApacheDS paragraph in the 2dn edition of my LDAP
little German book for Java developers
(http://www.entwickler.com/buecher/ldap/, 1st edition), and I asked
myself, which J2SE is minumum for running the server. Due to new IO I
would guess it is 1.4, and I successfully started the server on that
version. The Mina Wiki states SSL support uses 1.5 functionality
(javax.net.ssl.SSLEngine), which would lead to a higher version
reqirement, if we would support ldaps that way.

What should I tell my readers? Take into account, that the book, once
printed, can't be changed. So if think JSE 5 will be mandatory in the
medium term, it is also an option just to say "it needs J(2)SE".

Thanks in advance for a statement here,
Stefan








[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: Minumum/recommended J2SE version for Apache DS  
Alex Karasulu


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
08-29-05 10:45 PM

Stefan Zoerner wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> Currently I finish the ApacheDS paragraph in the 2dn edition of my
> LDAP little German book for Java developers
> (http://www.entwickler.com/buecher/ldap/, 1st edition), and I asked
> myself, which J2SE is minumum for running the server. Due to new IO I
> would guess it is 1.4, and I successfully started the server on that
> version. The Mina Wiki states SSL support uses 1.5 functionality
> (javax.net.ssl.SSLEngine), which would lead to a higher version
> reqirement, if we would support ldaps that way.
>
> What should I tell my readers? Take into account, that the book, once
> printed, can't be changed. So if think JSE 5 will be mandatory in the
> medium term, it is also an option just to say "it needs J(2)SE".
>
Tell them for LDAP they need 1.4 at a bare minimum.  For LDAPS they will
need 1.5.

Alex







[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 03:47 AM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register