08-31-05 10:50 PM
Hi Daniel,
Lobby to lobby is non trivial. A lobby only has to connect to other
lobbies that they need to communicate with. If a user wants to send an
invitation to 10 other people divided across five other lobbies only
those five lobbies have to be connected. When another user wants to send
an invitation other lobbies may have to be contacted. Figuring out the
best number of clients for the lobbies, how long to leave a
NetConnection open etc is non trivial. So, no, not every lobby is
connected to every other lobby. There are lots of way to setup and name
instances. In general the names should reflect what you are doing. For
example:
chat/lobby/lobby1
chat/lobby/lobby2
chat/room/room1
chat/room/room2
or
chatLobby/lobby1
chatLobby/lobby2
chatRoom/room1
chatRoom/room2
Yours truly,
-Brian
Daniel Pedro wrote:
> Thanx for the reply Brian, Having read your reply I have a better idea of how to a
ttack this. for larger scale you mention using lobby to lobby connections...Are you
saying every lobby will have to connect to every other virtual lobby? will the roo
ms
be called through app/lobby002/room003? Sorry for my lack of knowledge in this but a simple
example would really help. cheers Robert---
>
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|