02-12-04 01:34 AM
hi darin,
I forced nslookup to use TCP (instead of UDP) and everything looks
fine - which means I get the correct MX records.
I'm sorry, but I did not understand this sentence:
"To take DNS out of the picture, on the SMTP box you can create a
remote domain and forward mail to that domain to IP address the nslookup
returned for the MX record. "
could you explain to me how to do that?
in the meantime I did a workaround: I installed MERCURY which is a free
SMPT / POP3 / IMAP server (www.pmail.com) for win32 - with this one I
have no problems sending mail - but I would be happier if I could do that
with
the SMTP server of win2k of course.
thx for your help,
andi
"Darin Roulston [MSFT]" <darinr@online.microsoft.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:OGTUGJO8DHA.2796@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> What events do you see in the event logs (probably event 4000 from
smtpsvc)?
> One idea is that it could be DNS. When you do a nslookup you are using UDP
> but Windows 2000 uses TCP for DNS queries. To take DNS out of the picture,
> on the SMTP box you can create a remote domain and forward mail to that
> domain to IP address the nslookup returned for the MX record. If the mail
> then goes to that domain, DNS is your problem. You can force nslookup to
> query using TCP to test this theory using the following article
> http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...KB;EN-US;263237
>
> --
> Darin Roulston
> Microsoft PSS
>
> Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This alias is for
> newsgroup purposes only.
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
> "andi_st" <silvervelvet@gmx.de> wrote in message
> news:OaPpaFK8DHA.3288@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
them
> in
>
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|