On Thu, 22 Sep 2005 13:58:27 +0000, Zax wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 20:43:11 -0400, Stephen K  Gielda wrote in Message-Id:
> <MPG.1d9bc82caa2e5715989b3f@news.newsreader.com>:
> 
>
> To further fuel that speculation, the remailer is running with zero
> latency - Message comes in, message goes out.

My observation of the remailer indicates you are incorrect. The
latency varies from 1 to 10 minutes.


> Add to that the low
> utilization due to stats not listing it and you have a very transparent
> remailer indeed.

That's true of any new remailer, I suppose. There is a good deal of dummy
traffic generated, which should help plug any such temporary hole.


>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQEVAwUBQzK4g2oLu9HNUqmMAQqUHAf/Y5QYKgvStSGPkmgUtRuReLTBBXAVcqLE
>  mIKwSSkAxEIlRxTNcG5NXEjmnYdmMSOtSeaF8Yzn
t69OXBFzKZk7KZLkxs5KyWnU
> LEPwqsTEJxc3NNWZA9J5vgCGS4U7d/BFR+HH+0jCPCwtU3nXjkAlEekOimVrX1N8
>  vfHsFNHjExsM7Ix9mn1YNrtdRIwQmtzMZ+jAPRQR
ivsGWo7JEUoL6GbcOEXv3EyR
> jqVQPEcbPq7VP2kkzLQF10HgRMaUjeA+Ndk4tB/Mw+vznjCBWqKXcaXPsvOvWAbQ
> ERPZ8YO3pf9U5Hv9RIkJ5cXdMmZK4pp6zv/E+B1SQSBKx+wn1nUhVA== =KO8f
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]