In article <43332815$0$11074$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>, nospam@hccnet.nl
says...
> Stephen K. Gielda wrote:
> 
>
> And I thought that I was paranoid ;-) You've been hanging around the
> machine too long Stephen (and Zax)  <grin>
>

It's not that, it's more that I cannot see any possible reason for the
number of times he's started up a remailer only to run it for a week or
two and shut it down again.  About the only thing I can think of would
be that he sets up his remailer when he targets someone and then starts
announcing the easy post, non-anonymous service, knowing that his target
is looking for the fastest and easiest way to post and will most likely
start using it.

Of course I could be wrong, but the number of times he's now surfaced
only to again shut down within a week or two makes no sense.  Even pure
incompetence would have resigned it all by now.  If he had ISP issues,
after about the fourth try he'd have given up.  If he was legitimate and
really didn't want to be segmented from the remailer network, he would
have opened again on the qt, working to be anonymous from his past.  But
no, he wants to be segmented and he only runs for a couple weeks before
shutting down again.  It's looking like it must be something else to it
and a specific target when he starts it up again, CoS run maybe?

/steve
--
Free Privacy Resources
http://www.cotse.net/resources.html

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]