This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
server at frell.theremailer.net.  If you do not want to receive
anonymous messages, please contact abuse@frell.theremailer.net.

-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Message-type: plaintext

In <G34HD6HP38617.5634259259@anonymous.poster> Wolff Wehrkugel <wehrkugel@paderborn.go.comm>
 wrote:
>Remailer-Type: Reliable v1.0.6rc2 panta
>Generated: 22 Sep 2005 17:28:18 -0000
>
snip

>NEWS
>    Anon-Post-To Supported (post):   True
>    News Posting Route (mail2news):
>        mail2news@news.gradwell.net,mail2news@dizum.com

gradwell.net is NOT a valid mail2news route

>    News Signature Added To:   None
>
>
>ANON-POST-TO - BLOCKED NEWSGROUPS
>alt.example.group.name
>alt.example.domain.*

In <KOU5C9P838617.5634259259@anonymous.poster> you state
>last-hop, full from headers, 24x7, low-latency remailer.
>
>lots of spam filters.
>
>puts disclaimers selectively into problem newsgroups as
>a last resort before blocking the newsgroups.
>
>

Given the above settings in Reliable, and this statement, something is very
badly wrong here.  I have the panta version y're using and it does NOT have
any option to selectively add disclaimers and it does NOT have spam filters.

Thus I must conclude that you have been re-writing Reliable's code to add fe
atures
to it. Yet your remailer-conf indicates you're running a Panta build.  This
cannot be.  You are hacking carelessly around in Reliable, making god knows
what kind of mess with it and then you expect people to trust you with
their anonymity???!?!!

You are outside your mind.


>
>
>
>
>STRIPPED HEADERS (Outgoing)
>[List Empty]
>

Another example of flat stupidity.  ***NOBODY*** with two brain cells to rub
together leaves this entry blank!!!  Doing so defeats the whole point
of a remailer.


-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:36:19 +0200, mixminion-nobody wrote:

 
>
> gradwell.net is NOT a valid mail2news route

Really? If that's correct, I'll remove it, but I thought it was working.


> 
>
> In <KOU5C9P838617.5634259259@anonymous.poster> you state 
> Given the above settings in Reliable, and this statement, something is
> very badly wrong here.  I have the panta version y're using and it does
> NOT have any option to selectively add disclaimers and it does NOT have
> spam filters.

The filters exist in the mercury mail server, which is used to fetch and
send mail, and in an additional VB module which I wrote to complement
Reliable. The VB module also does the processing for the disclaimers, and
has some anti-flooding routines.


>
> Thus I must conclude that you have been re-writing Reliable's code to add
> features to it. Yet your remailer-conf indicates you're running a Panta
> build.  This cannot be.  You are hacking carelessly around in Reliable,

Did you really believe that when you wrote it?

> making god knows what kind of mess with it and then you expect people to
> trust you with their anonymity???!?!!
>
> You are outside your mind.
>
>
> 
> Another example of flat stupidity.  ***NOBODY*** with two brain cells to
> rub together leaves this entry blank!!!  Doing so defeats the whole point
> of a remailer.

That same handy VB module removes all headers except those it explicitly
allows. I thought this was safer than removing only specific headers,
since a user may be careless and leave in some header that points back to
him, or a crooked remailer may insert a header in some way that points to
the user.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDM/ cnOSpN6XcymHsRApR8AKCM4Sx196B+Et5bLiUADD
XaSrwbUACfSW4F
Ofex5oJS0KhxZB/6tRjPviw=
=O8Fl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <1127479242. b9e40412136dab263e5cfbb5fdbc1755@teranew
s>
admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 07:36:19 +0200, mixminion-nobody wrote:
>
> 
>
> Really? If that's correct, I'll remove it, but I thought it was working.

It only works for some select few, the rest of the world needs to go
elslwhere.
 
>
> The filters exist in the mercury mail server, which is used to fetch and
> send mail, and in an additional VB module which I wrote to complement
> Reliable. The VB module also does the processing for the disclaimers, and
> has some anti-flooding routines.

This VB module, is it Open Source or is it a secret?  Will you post
the source code here for all to examine?
 
>
> Did you really believe that when you wrote it?

Yes.  I still belive it because you are a proven incompetent.
 
>
> That same handy VB module removes all headers except those it explicitly
> allows. I thought this was safer than removing only specific headers,
> since a user may be careless and leave in some header that points back to
> him, or a crooked remailer may insert a header in some way that points to
> the user.

I still don't trust it... or you.  I assume that this same VB module
also scans any cleartext looking for interesting words and phrases,
sending a copy of anything it detects to a "special" email account
for your perusal?

Is this the one and the same VB module that was used to edit people's
newsgroup postings, changing what people said, breaking pgp
signatures, and generally making you look like a totalitarian wannabe
fool by putting those damnable [CENSORED] [HATE SPEECH]
[THOUGHTCRIME] [NO WAY] stamps in peoples posts?

Is this the same VB module that you have used to perform various and
sundry tasks to aid you in your efforts to violate every remop ethic
by tracking and publicly outing users?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This message was posted via one or more anonymous remailing services.
The original sender is unknown.  Any address shown in the From header
is unverified. You need a valid hashcash token to post to groups other
than alt.test and alt.anonymous.messages. Visit www.panta-rhei.dyndns.org
for abuse and hashcash info.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 03:36:23 +0000, Fritz Wuehler wrote:

>
> I still don't trust it... or you.  I assume that this same VB module also
> scans any cleartext looking for interesting words and phrases, sending a
> copy of anything it detects to a "special" email account for your perusal?

Man, you are one sick sonofabitch. Who the hell cares about some geeky 'rema
iler' and how it is run? Why would anyone think that the operator of the gee
ky remailer was saving mail to a "special" account? Nobody would even give a
 shit unless he was somebod
y who was half nuts.

>
> Is this the one and the same VB module that was used to edit people's
> newsgroup postings, changing what people said, breaking pgp signatures,
> and generally making you look like a totalitarian wannabe fool by putting
> those damnable [CENSORED] [HATE SPEECH] [THOUGHTCRIME] [NO
 WAY] stamps in
> peoples posts?

I thought they were amusing and posted several times to apas just to see wha
t changes would be made. Again, why would anybody who is sane go on about so
mething so trivial? "damnable" huh? You are a sick bastard, probably in your
 forties, but with the emot
ions of a child; somebody who lives with his parents and is a virgin. Why do
nt you get a life instead of fixating on this crap?


>
> Is this the same VB module that you have used to perform various and
> sundry tasks to aid you in your efforts to violate every remop ethic by
> tracking and publicly outing users?

Sad stuff. Put this remailer crap in perspective. Get some help.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 03:36:23 +0000, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
> 
>
>Man, you are one sick sonofabitch. Who the hell cares about some geeky
>'remailer' and how it is run? Why would anyone think that the operator of
>the geeky remailer was saving mail to a "special" account? Nobody would
>even give a shit unless he was somebody who was half nuts.
> 
>
>I thought they were amusing and posted several times to apas just to see
>what changes would be made. Again, why would anybody who is sane go on
>about something so trivial? "damnable" huh? You are a sick bastard,
>probably in your forties, but with the emotions of a child; somebody who
>lives with his parents and is a virgin. Why dont you get a life instead of
>fixating on this crap?
>

Eelbash, you still are easily identifiable, even when you try to post like
someone else. Give it up, freak. No matter what you do, that pompous
arrogance comes shining through.

Oh, yeah... and XXXX off.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In <50075a57a10d00bf5c3aa98f79bcfca2@dizum.com>, nobody@dizum.com wrote:
>On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 03:36:23 +0000, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
> 
>
>Man, you are one sick sonofabitch. Who the hell cares about some geeky
>'remailer' and how it is run? Why would anyone think that the operator of t
he
>geeky remailer was saving mail to a "special" account? Nobody would even gi
ve a
>shit unless he was somebody who was half nuts.


The people who USE remailers have reason to care.  If you don't, what the fu
ck are you doing in alt.privacy.anon-server where REMAILERS are the subject 
under discussion?

> 
>
>I thought they were amusing and posted several times to apas just to see wh
at
>changes would be made. Again, why would anybody who is sane go on about
>something so trivial? "damnable" huh? You are a sick bastard, probably in y
our
>forties, but with the emotions of a child; somebody who lives with his pare
nts
>and is a virgin. Why dont you get a life instead of fixating on this crap?


Why don't you turn your daddy's computer off and go back to playing with you
r wee-little-willie?


> 
>
>Sad stuff. Put this remailer crap in perspective. Get some help.

If you don't think its important, then again I ask, what the XXXX are you do
ing reading a newsgroup that is ABOUT the thing you claim not to give a shit
 about?

That said, it occurrs to me i've seen this attitude before...

Shut up Eelbash.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]