09-23-05 10:45 PM
While that would be a neat feature you'd have to have a NIC with the
ability to handle the dot1q tagged packets. I'm sure this would
prevent most laptop users from using the software.
-Ryan
On Sep 23, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
So the softphones are in the data vlan?
I would have imagined that they would make the PC behave like a true IP
phone: have a trunk to the switch, listen to the CDP advertisement of
the
voice VLAN, and tag the outgoing voice packets with it (leaving the data
packets untagged)...
Now wouldn't that be nice?
Vincent
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
> Sent: vendredi 23 septembre 2005 15:28
> To: Nasser Khwaja
> Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Softphone versus Hardphone Vlan Constraint
>
> If you are routing between the data and voice vlans then there should
> be no issue. If you are not routing between the two then that is a
> problem.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Sep 23, 2005, at 7:40 AM, Nasser Khwaja wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I already have cisco IP Hard phones working within a VOICE VLAN
> together with the CallManager, and the PCs in a DATA VLAN.
> Now I need to install Softphones on PCs; and since these PCs are in
> the Data Vlan subnet, my question is How do my cisco Softphones get
> the dialtone from the CallManager which is in a separate Voice Vlan
> subnet?
>
> Your response will be appreciated.
> Thanks
> -Tennisman
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
> ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
| 
