So, the Linux/GPG thing is a lost cause with 95%+ of the Cypherpunks
remailers.

Does anyone know if Linux/Mixmaster will work?

It seems to me that it should have the same fatal problems that Linux/GPG
had
with the Cypherpunks remailers, but I may be missing something.

I just don't want to waste three more months beating yet another Linux dead
horse.

If anyone has had consistent success with Linux/Mixmaster and the T-2
remailers, please let me know - and if so, is there a Linux GUI frontend
for
Mixmaster?

Thanks!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

[alt.security.pgp hijacked]

George Orwell wrote:
> So, the Linux/GPG thing is a lost cause with 95%+ of the Cypherpunks
> remailers.
>
> Does anyone know if Linux/Mixmaster will work?

http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgp/ve...re/unix/2.6.3i/
will work. I am sure of it. It is a pitty you were not able to resolve
your problems with GnuPG because that should run too with the right
settings IMHO.

Thomas
- --
Life is like a videogame with no chance to win - ATR
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQB5AwUBQz0b/ AEP2l8iXKAJAQHlagMffFA8jUmCH0IF02xXStwes
ot4dj7+g3P/
YnsgcbdRjVH6rXSCUsPp5FJsPLw/wrRpw6tGiJxi3kelgx6e4phiWxQAy4JZoApU
 jMh1RKs+VRgY4SmM5qiIS5c8HY6jlnfOAjPRkg==

=xcQ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, George Orwell wrote:
>So, the Linux/GPG thing is a lost cause with 95%+ of the Cypherpunks remail
ers.
>

If you are having problems with final hop UNIX based remailers there
is a formatting problem with your original crafted message.


There IS a problem if the final hop remailer is Reliable (Windows based)
ONLY when the original crafted message has UNIX EOL convention.

This is a "original crafted message"

::
Anon-To: final@recipient.com

##
Subject: This is the subject of the message

This is the text of the message which will be sent anonymously to
the final recipient with the subject "This is the subject of the message".


>Does anyone know if Linux/Mixmaster will work?
>

There is no problem with Mixmaster messages.

>It seems to me that it should have the same fatal problems that
>Linux/GPG had with the Cypherpunks remailers, but I may be missing somethin
g.
>

You are missing the root cause of the problem.


Ciao!

BiKiKii

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQEVAwUBQzyAAfRwi/QFFzi5AQGJiAf+O0SXx0r/L8wSJm8HK6ss51n7K0mFSrGy
QMvphycnpQ6aVRXo4shrxaWSdN2QK/l4KAsPFy4nSJs4Z+Lr32fiH08pTVnHjxvy
 QhHh7FUWG8Bc0cZaEYwFe6JHpeeIHYtzBqyuNgUT
uPS4esbwIw9rO9pt7aV/x2pL
bhb5YNIOhVufNSHV7NFgJrrNXQXUHPzwM/a+OlLYG7ZLwix2/YYJIWYNmJi9N/51
 Wj3nnO34EpU7Eta1g8C31PBI5NOV74pu0gvFnECl
+hcqfu2qZPbC9t8NVuPQOBx6
 BmyYsXvTEC+xginyq8n9zA67i9bzrIXPueI2pTnF
WAWL2YeUAqzLHg==
=lLdK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

This is a Type III anonymous message, sent to you by the Mixminion
server at winnie.winstonsmith.info.  If you do not want to receive
anonymous messages, please contact winnie-admin@winstonsmith.info

-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
Message-type: plaintext

In < 7fbd2129993c698b6351574fa77d47df@mixmast
er.it> George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote
:
>So, the Linux/GPG thing is a lost cause with 95%+ of the Cypherpunks
>remailers.

It's not a lost cause, it just needs proper line ending translation, somethi
ng
that I would honestly be surprized if it were not available in it's settings
someplace

>Does anyone know if Linux/Mixmaster will work?
>

I don't doubt it, several Mixmaster remailers are running on Linux

>It seems to me that it should have the same fatal problems that Linux/GPG
>had with the Cypherpunks remailers, but I may be missing something.
>
>I just don't want to waste three more months beating yet another Linux dead
>horse.
>
>If anyone has had consistent success with Linux/Mixmaster and the T-2
>remailers, please let me know - and if so, is there a Linux GUI frontend
>for
>Mixmaster?

The closest I know of to that is if you compile mixmaster with ncurses you g
et
a rudimentary text based interface.  But a windows style GUI like JBN or
Quicksilver?  No, I don't believe such has been written yet.

-----END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In alt.privacy.anon-server Thomas J. Boschloo <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

: [alt.security.pgp hijacked]

: George Orwell wrote:
: > So, the Linux/GPG thing is a lost cause with 95%+ of the Cypherpunks
: > remailers.
: >
: > Does anyone know if Linux/Mixmaster will work?

: http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgp/ve...re/unix/2.6.3i/
: will work. I am sure of it. It is a pitty you were not able to resolve
: your problems with GnuPG because that should run too with the right
: settings IMHO.

I believe for GnuPG to work you need to format it as text/convert, and
install the idea plugin.

ftp://ftp.gnupg.dk/pub/contrib-dk/idea.c.gz

Cheers,
-aj-

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 30 Sep 2005 11:57:17 -0000, BiKiKii Admin wrote in
Message-Id: <3D5B3E3D60@bikikii.ath.cx>:

>
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, George Orwell wrote: 
>
> If you are having problems with final hop UNIX based remailers there
> is a formatting problem with your original crafted message.
>
>
> There IS a problem if the final hop remailer is Reliable (Windows based)
> ONLY when the original crafted message has UNIX EOL convention.

So the answer is to format the message correctly to match the
expectations of the recipient remailer?  If it's nix based, the message
should be LF formatted.  If it's windows based, the message should be
CRLF formatted.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBQz1VIWoLu9HNUqmMAQpP/Af/QuqF3mRQH0kf4gFJl7xhotsmzeNY9UOC
EZ7aMtbJ/xSYDMs/ kxU6ARYTom97DezGHanup1UXOoMxxKKnooTWTbcw
LWiG158V
vDX+jUPVlDC7DHQBogFn23r6J/HjXp7xlxGGWEtG4+jV48stbfNpG4UPAqcg1uQH
tfAWS2zK5uvF6bHma+4iDuwQjvDv8q/kNDKTVkGiRanlMWJcW//8YguFttrK+dTa
uvl/uS/ AbSlZe27fPBaJfpbBcg0BPZbf7argUneBroeKHvc
mq3BRmu3LzUNIpsFQ
S4vO4ULFFCljr/VFRPlMi1DD4KL/e6x3X7JUw0HXIiS9Rzba+t4sFw==
=l58s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
pub  1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE  EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid                            Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Zax wrote:
>On 30 Sep 2005 11:57:17 -0000, BiKiKii Admin wrote in
>Message-Id: <3D5B3E3D60@bikikii.ath.cx>:
> 
>
>So the answer is to format the message correctly to match the
>expectations of the recipient remailer?  If it's nix based, the message
>should be LF formatted.  If it's windows based, the message should be
>CRLF formatted.
>

Hello Zax,

No if that were the case NO user of DOS/Windows could have a
successfull CPunk message with a UNIX remailer as final hop.

The problem is that Reliable needs all EOL to be CRLF in the "headers"
portion of the original crafted message.

See below.

This is not an issue with the headers of the intermediate message of a
CPunk chain because EOL are made DOS by SMTP.


Ciao!

BiKiKii




This is "original crafted message" (TESTMSG1.TXT) will fail:

::<LF>
Anon-To: final@recipient.com<LF>
<LF>
##<LF>
Subject: This is the subject<LF>
<LF>
This is the body of the<LF>
"original crafted message"<LF>
using all UNIX EOL.<LF>

This is "original crafted message" (TESTMSG2.TXT) is OK and will be processe
d:

::<CRLF>
Anon-To: final@recipient.com<CRLF>
<CRLF>
##<CRLF>
Subject: This is the subject<CRLF>
<CRLF>
This is the body of the<LF>
"original crafted message"<LF>
using DOS EOL in the headers<LF>
and UNIX EOL in the body.<LF>


This is what Reliable will display:

00:12 Processing started
00:12 TESTMSG1.TXT  1 of 2  (30-Sep-05 00:03)
Plain message (...\maildump\TESTMSG1.TXT)
00:12 TESTMSG2.TXT  2 of 2  (30-Sep-05 00:10)
00:12 Processing done.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQEVAwUBQzyAAfRwi/QFFzi5AQE00gf/VvLXVp8WfQ4odKwiEoPV/cdB661yfOlh
 uA3wFPtG3yevGejfyz3ovuDpv48MTAdVevrL8FTH
P+udmS6S66HceK93jnBlMnWB
 SgS5yFrwTu7hDWrhl61Mhk73Xyw55DKRFFf30BBO
DyH1zxw6nWedI8pSafrHR7un
8AEJL+9eiUjC2VbQPMji3scU9i/NjjEYtMplvCaAQwkj4+ngZ7V/r3cJMZDg5Opt
JHu81Rip8hetiy/ ZjR04Lsq1eZ7ZAVsvUAix1Q4DfUSeBGnrClPWjiZ
dXQ+KeMMl
 z1jlcpB1Ooaiw94fGtFwoqNg3eJlEFz8YbVzhda8
cpBJ6HujexgCmQ==
=fUxu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]