[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-188?page=all ]

Craig Russell updated JDO-188:
------------------------------

Attachment: jdo-188.patch

This patch includes comments from Michael (thanks, I missed the cleanup of t
he second PM), an update to the alltests.conf, and a slightly different impl
ementation of JDOHelper.getObjectIds(Object[ ]).

I plan to check it in tomorrow.


> Add tests for static JDOHelper.getObjectIds methods
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: JDO-188
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-188
>      Project: JDO
>         Type: Test
>   Components: tck20
>  Environment: TCK
>     Reporter: Craig Russell
>     Assignee: Craig Russell
>  Attachments: jdo-188.patch, jdo-188.patch
>
> A8.3-11 [static Object[] getObjectIds (Object[] pcs); static Collectio
n getObjectIds (Collection pcs); These methods return the JDO identities of the para
meter instances. For each instance in the parameter, the getObjectId method is calle
d. They return
one identity instance for each persistence-capable instance in the parameter. The order of i
teration of the returned Collection exactly matches the order of iteration of the parameter 
Collection].
> The test case api.persistencemanager.GetObjectIds needs a test method per 
API.
> The setUp method creates 50 persistent instances of type PCPoint and stores the id
s in an ArrayList and the instances in a separate ArrayList. The test case call getO
bjectIds and verify that the object ids returned match the objects ids that are in t
he
list.
> There are no negative tests.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]