11-09-05 10:45 PM
In article <1131455887.848658.203200@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, Joel
<joel.feinstein@gmail.com> writes
>Peter Pratten wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
>Looks like a bug in our software to me! I will have to investigate.
>We will move to more frequent updates when we have finished writing our
>auto-update scripts.
Good idea.
> Meanwhile, you can try our rival site, the niftylist, at
>http://www.niftylist.co.uk
Having a couple of rate sites is a good idea but does not cover what I
was looking for.
>(You could also look at discussion in their chat forum or on our google
>group.)
These are fine for getting updates and asking questions but take a lot
of searching for answers which may very well be listed somewhere.
Actually I was while trying it Internet Explorer fell over and closed
down :-(
What I am suggesting is a comparison table listing which providers:
use softphone;
use SIP phone and/or ATA;
interconnect peer-to-peer to other networks (I assume they all do to
their own - correct me if I'm wrong);
require a subscription;
provide phone out to PSTN networks;
provide free calls to UK phones (for other countries use the lists you
mentioned);
charge calls by credit/debit card;
charge calls by direct debit;
charge calls to a deposited amount.
You may think of a few other points. A single table kept up-to-date
would be easier to help choose which provider is most suitable, after
all call costs are not the only consideration.
--
Peter Pratten
Please reply in group only
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|