-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The psychopath who calls himself 'spamhunter' has been lodging bogus
complaints with yi.org, as well as my isp, about the remailer.

Same stuff as before, except he has now branded my wife's hobby domain as
part of the bogus 'spam'. She is upset, and since I do not want her to
lose the pleasure her hobby gives her, I have shut down the remailer,
effective immediately.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

 iD8DBQFDdrvzYyZq98cTxEkRAgTIAJ49I6aECbct
AjwNwb185qqnzKYbwACfQK2X
AKtV4BsqqJ4VWAh2RmDMzoA=
=eqza
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:

>The psychopath who calls himself 'spamhunter' has been lodging bogus
>complaints with yi.org, as well as my isp, about the remailer.

>Same stuff as before, except he has now branded my wife's hobby domain as
>part of the bogus 'spam'. She is upset, and since I do not want her to
>lose the pleasure her hobby gives her, I have shut down the remailer,
>effective immediately.

Good.  XXXX off.

Don't come back!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <437747d5$0$11074$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>
Thomas J. Boschloo <nospam@hccnet.nl> wrote:
>
> Eelbash Admin wrote: 

Another $30 for Jeremy.
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hmm, how about the pleasure your hobby has given us?
> I feel sorry for your wife..
>
> Thomas

He'll be back in less than a month to pleasure you again. It's an
endless cycle.

Any bets on what his new name will be?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:07:42 -0500, Eelbash Admin wrote in
Message-Id: <pan.2005.11.13.04.07.42.165447@eelbash.yi.org>:

> The psychopath who calls himself 'spamhunter' has been lodging bogus
> complaints with yi.org, as well as my isp, about the remailer.

Sorry to hear that.
Makes you wonder about the mentality of someone who is prepared to spend
time and effort writing lies in order to get somebody else into trouble.
Not to mention the cost to the remailer network as a whole if we start
losing nodes to behaviour like that.  So far this year we have lost 14
remailers and gained 3; not a good statistic.

> Same stuff as before, except he has now branded my wife's hobby domain as
> part of the bogus 'spam'. She is upset, and since I do not want her to
> lose the pleasure her hobby gives her, I have shut down the remailer,
> effective immediately.

My sympathies to her too.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iQEVAwUBQ3eeAGoLu9HNUqmMAQoDWgf/QJH1gAzaAE2zIQFG4onh3o5DVX2t5Uw1
 McaEmsZegS+aeqSJkP4Ts046tmVmntWlldSBtuXv
Up0VHT96tXrDmCpLJImA6NOV
ot1QRjyUKvwsIDsWvk/ RKch3nzEILA1+7aAquo2C0B0j5F1lqSh9qvxtfnG
iDS+P
 3peN8y49aRsk3C+ZDumbmqQU2CQRCkeVZ+tFSNoG
TJxPlKXtJtAp/lKCYy57k8ha
CKHcim4J/8MRk/ +z0ZZ8+VvGNk2yktyt7PVkw28j7a8eDovP42QvCs
R55wKv+kkA
 xVORJND0n5zYM6GiYNACDvqr0niJqluci6IEFCWV
GxyFaAWWjT/wKA==
=fvo8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
pub  1024D/8ED57743 2003-07-08 Bananasplit Operator
Key fingerprint = 796F 67E0 E890 A0BB BDAE  EBB4 94A6 7A09 8ED5 7743
uid                            Admin <admin.bananasplit.info>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <dl86m1$6ko$1@bananasplit.info>
Zax <fleegle@bananasplit.info> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:07:42 -0500, Eelbash Admin wrote in
> Message-Id: <pan.2005.11.13.04.07.42.165447@eelbash.yi.org>:
> 
>
> Sorry to hear that.
> Makes you wonder about the mentality of someone who is prepared to spend
> time and effort writing lies in order to get somebody else into trouble.
> Not to mention the cost to the remailer network as a whole if we start
> losing nodes to behaviour like that.  So far this year we have lost 14
> remailers and gained 3; not a good statistic.
>

The man lies through his teeth all the time. What makes you believe
what he says in this post?

Some imaginary guy who calls himself spamhunter manages to get
Eelbash's account cancelled, and yet eelbash.yi.org was working right
up until he posted that message. They would cancel his account
immediately, not wait for him to do it.

It's far more likely that he's shutting down due to lack of use (again)
and came up with an excuse to sound like the victim again. He did this
the last time he shut down. Said that he'd lost his ISP account or
something, and yet he came back up a month later on the same IP with
a different nickname, and on yi.org again too. They would have blocked
his IP address if they'd really cancelled his account.

I really can't believe a word the man says any more. After reading
sock puppet posts where he pretends to be an old lady who thinks that
remailers should filter, I find it impossible to take him seriously.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:16:15 -0500, George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it>
wrote:

> On 13 Nov 2005, Anonymous <Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1]> wrote:
 
>
> There is a nutcase that calls himself spamhunter. If I recall he has been
> making trouble for 4 or 5 years.

I didn't realize he has been loose for so long.

> Despite the fact that I would have never used his remailer as an exit, we
> have too few exits as it is.
> Allowing cleartext for an exit remailer is a disaster waiting to happen.
> Eelbash opened himself up to be used as a spam machine by allowing
> cleartext. Maybe that is why he was obsessed with flooding.

What is 'cleartext' in the context of a remailer?

>
> The nutcase spamhunter could have used his remailer to spam everyone and
> everything, then file a complaint. Who the hell knows?
>
> Let's hope the remaining exit remailers don't find themselves in the same
> place. Without the exits, kiss it all goodbye.
>
> Anybody even know how many exits are left? <15 maybe? Whatever, it is
> not a
> lot. With Italy gone, and the recent change of one from exit to middle
> is a
> bad sign IMHO. What will be next, the few reliable nymservers?
>

I admit remailers have a PR problem if they are going to require that the
readers of newsgroups that are flooded or spammed by remailer messages,
have the responsibility to use a sophisticated client like Xnews, and
master its filters.

It's a noble thought that remailers will not filter, but in the real
world, the average reader of a newsgroup is going to use something like
the filters in Outlook Express, and demand that the source of the messages
do something, rather than buy into the idea that he should learn how to do
real filtering.

Once his anger at what remailers are heaping on _his_ newsgroup trickles
up to enough isps, or, God forbid, to politicians, then remailers really
will be in trouble.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

> He'll be back in less than a month to pleasure you again. It's an
> endless cycle.
>
> Any bets on what his new name will be?

asmodeus?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Eelbash Admin <admin@eelbash.yi.org> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>The psychopath who calls himself 'spamhunter' has been lodging bogus
>complaints with yi.org, as well as my isp, about the remailer.
>
>Same stuff as before, except he has now branded my wife's hobby domain as
>part of the bogus 'spam'. She is upset, and since I do not want her to
>lose the pleasure her hobby gives her, I have shut down the remailer,
>effective immediately.
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFDdrvzYyZq98cTxEkRAgTIAJ49I6aECbct
AjwNwb185qqnzKYbwACfQK2X
>AKtV4BsqqJ4VWAh2RmDMzoA=
>=eqza
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Awesome!

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <dl86m1$6ko$1@bananasplit.info>
Zax <fleegle@bananasplit.info> wrote:

>On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:07:42 -0500, Eelbash Admin wrote in
>Message-Id: <pan.2005.11.13.04.07.42.165447@eelbash.yi.org>:
> 
>
>Sorry to hear that.

Huh? Zax, is that you? You supporting a net-abuser now? I'm shocked.
Do you remember the discussions about Frog-Admin? I don't agree on
everything, but he indeed did things he shouldn't have done. Eelbash
is way worse compared to him. So let's summarize: You're against
Frog-Admin but are siding with Eelbash. Please clarify, thanks.

>Makes you wonder about the mentality of someone who is prepared to spend
>time and effort writing lies in order to get somebody else into trouble.

What's even worse, someone who is prepared to spend time and effort
running a remailer in order to get people and the remailer-network
into trouble.

>Not to mention the cost to the remailer network as a whole if we start
>losing nodes to behaviour like that.

You see "eelbash" as a valuable node?

>So far this year we have lost 14 remailers and gained 3; not a good
>statistic.

I agree.
 
>
>My sympathies to her too.

You actually believe his drivel? Who'd thunk that.


*** emperor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/ AwUBQ3hhPDk6FTOF+YXVEQJVwQCgsRzsFn+ayUJt
mj8JUyPb872+otIAn22t
1nSHeJT09LC8mIhntvR1SlOs
=jAx+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Former Remop wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:16:15 -0500, George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it>
> wrote:
 
>
>
> What is 'cleartext' in the context of a remailer?

The lack of pgponly in:
$remailer{"eelbash"} = "<remailer@eelbash.yi.org> cpunk mix hybrid pgp
latent ek ekx esub cut hash post repgp remix reord ext max test inflt75
rhop2 klen31";
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

 iQB5AwUBQ3iBEQEP2l8iXKAJAQH6wAMgtdrUpIiF
HrqCsCJCbZuYjbZQRinBs9tN
 28dDylpgCLXMwoWnaPH2Zms5Bc2fnO5yb5Qnyc9V
HulE8EMqJlQKdHRSbEBrp4He
Gx1/xVU/UdbmWP9/vJBRIxbwKW9+f0HuNLOM4g==
=6FWh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]