11-18-05 12:45 PM
I'm very disturbed over this tactic, if absolutely true. I currently have
FCS 1.5 and have invested over 1 year developing an FCS application that I
have finally found a buyer for. This application will require an unlimited
license, which I can no longer buy for any price, anywhere?
I'm really fuming over the fact that I paid $4,500.00 for a product, labor
costs and 12 months worth of dedicated server hosting to develop an
application that, thanks to vendor policy, no longer has viability. If I
should upgrade to the latest and greatest, what guarantee would I have that
Macromedia/Adobe would not pull the same thing again with the next release?
Let me be blunt here in case the meaning can't be inferred by Macromedia.
What kind of idiot company makes their previous product immediately unusable
the moment they come out with a new release? If this is true, this has to
rank really high in the annals of corporate stupidity.
Basically, Macromedia has killed my business with no notice or warning. This
is not how you win friends and allegiance. The statement about smart vendors
never defecating on their developers is quite true.
Arrogance has killed more than one corporation. I remember being at an IBM
booth at a trade show and someone asked an IBM salesman why they should buy
an expensive IBM computer and not one of the ones being sold in nearby
booths. The salesman drew himself up to his full height, looked down at the
questioner and said "Because we own the market". Seen any IBM PC's in a
store lately?
How long will it take for the lesson to sink in that Macromedia will
periodically introduce some things that will have the potential to destroy
your business? How many developers will take the risk to develop ANY
Macromedia applications then? Once that becomes known, how long will
Macromedia remain in business?
I understand the desire for Macromedia to get everyone to upgrade, but this
is pure thug tactics. IBM never gave their customers 30 days or less to
upgrade to the latest operating system or be cut off. Microsoft supported
Windows 98 long after Windows XP had been released.
If Macromedia wants their developers to upgrade, they should try the carrot
instead of a battering ram. Show us a product that has something other than
a draconian licensing plan and features that make it worthwhile. Don't
simply cancel our ability to survive and operate unless we follow your
orders.
I have no idea how I'll survive this little nicety. One year of development
and marketing has finally landed a customer that will be starting up within
15 days and now I have no way to support his volume.
Has anyone any knowledge of any FCS 1.5 unlimited licenses that I can buy
somewhere?
Best regards,
Michael Murray
----- Original Message -----
From: "GatorEye" <gatoreye-Bdlq13kUjeyLZ21kGMrzwg@public.gmane.org>
To: <flashcomm-1Ss2GqJETD3yZ38Mhd3e/9ZfFG6BLHNm@public.gmane.org>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 12:16 AM
Subject: [FlashComm] FMS 2 Licensing Changes - Left in the dark with no
options
> Steven,
>
> First, I would like to thank you and MM for stepping up and listening to
> the development community and making a change in your licensing (albeit
> a small concession). The fact that you've done *something* and admitted
> to the shortcomings made in market research is a good thing in my eyes.
> VERY few companies would step up to the plate like that.
>
> However, the scary part of this is how badly MM missed the mark on what
> people do with their product. It would seem to me then, that not only
> the licensing, but the features and whole roadmap of the product may be
> out of whack with what people want to use FCS/FMS for. If you don't
> know what people are currently doing with your product, how do you know
> what features to add to it? Let me give you some marketing advice... The
> first day of my marketing class - the professor took a textbook from a
> student, took out a power drill and drilled a hole all the way through
> it. Peering through the hole to us he professed, "People don't want 1/2"
> power drills, they want 1/2" holes. Marketing can be defined as finding
> out what people want and convincing people your product fills their
> need." Simply, MM is working in reverse by creating a product you think
> people want and trying to shoehorn it into areas it won't work with this
> new licensing strategy.
>
> Here's where you let me down. I'm running FCS 1.5 and need connections
> AND bw. If I were to have a need in three weeks for an unlimited
> connection/bw license, I'm screwed. Two weeks before the official
> release of FMS 2.0, the resellers stop selling the 90 day unlimited
> license. MM announces FMS yesterday and declares no more licenses for
> FCS 1.5 will be sold and they have informed all resellers they are
> prohibited from selling FCS 1.5 licenses. I now have no way to purchase
> unlimited licenses for FCS 1.5 and there are no unlimited connection/bw
> licenses available for FMS 2.0 (and even if there was, I'd have no
> intention of upgrading without getting new hardware, building new
> servers, and spending lots of time testing FMS 2.0 with all my current
> applications). Basically I have no options. This is outrageous.
>
> I know you want to force everyone to FMS 2.0, but you've left no
> migration period!!!! My suggestion - allow the continued purchase of FCS
> 1.5 Pro and Unlimited Licenses at least through some specified time
> period without cutting us off cold turkey. Also, offer an unlimited
> connection/unlimited BW license for FMS 2.0. I have no intention of
> upgrading with an "interim" license until I see everything else set in
> stone (although I do admit the offer is certainly an olive branch for
> those who are able to see how things play out, kudos again). Offering an
> extra 50 connections on top of 100 for a "professional" license is like
> offering someone who has been wandering the desert for a week, two drops
> of water instead of one out of your canteen.
>
> I can't encode live streaming video using the new codec? Where's the
> SDK that is supposed to let me send any stream (read Windows Media
> Server) to the Flash server? Where's the ability to save a JPG out of a
> stream?
>
> If you want to kick MS and Real in the gut, you need legions of
> developers like myself and those here on the list willing to develop all
> kinds of creative apps with your technology. A few larger customers vs.
> many smaller customers is a short term gain doomed for long term
> failure. Give us the tools and support at a reasonable price and we
> won't need to look at other alternatives. I've never heard of Red5 until
> this but it sure is getting a lot of attention. Why did ffmpeg get so
> much play (just to save a simple jpg out of a stream - is that REALLY
> too much to ask)? This new licensing policy is going to cost you more
> customers than you will gain by the technology it brings.
>
> Please address - unlimited connection/bw license availability for FCS
> 1.5 and FMS 2.0.
>
> A dissatisfied customer hoping my time learning, developing with and
> championing your technology was not a waste of time and money, but
> hopeful by your personal and prompt attention to our concerns.
>
> GatorEye
>
>
>
>
>
=-----------------------------------------------------------
Supported by Fig Leaf Software - http://www.figleaf.com
=-----------------------------------------------------------
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcomm
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|