RE: VT Advantage

I do point to point with no problem with CM 4.1.  It's just if you want
3 or more streams that you need a IPVC.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of IT
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

You cant even do point-to-point 2 member vt advantage calls?
What is the minimum IPVC necessary to get VT advantages working?

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

Without an IPVC conference bridge you can't do any video
conferencing, just like without a CFB you can't do any voice
conferencing.

-Ryan

On Nov 18, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Tim Ritter wrote:

Is there a way to have a conference call and have multiple VT
advantage cameras come up?
or is VT advantage only point to point video?

Thanks
Tim
 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ****************************************
**************
This email may contain trade secrets and/or other information that is
proprietary and/or confidential. Use of this by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not
the intended recipient, delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
 ****************************************
**************

 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip