VT Advantage
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > WebserverTalk Community > Voice Over IP > Voice over IP Cisco > VT Advantage




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    VT Advantage  
Tim Ritter


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
11-18-05 10:45 PM

Is there a way to have a conference call and have multiple VT advantage
cameras come up?
or is VT advantage only point to point video?
Thanks
Tim




Attachment:
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).



[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    RE: VT Advantage  
IT


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
11-19-05 01:45 AM

What is the minimum IPVC necessary to do a 3 or more VT advantage
stream?

-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:18 PM
To: IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

I do point to point with no problem with CM 4.1.  It's just if you want
3 or more streams that you need a IPVC.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of IT
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

You cant even do point-to-point 2 member vt advantage calls?
What is the minimum IPVC necessary to get VT advantages working?

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

Without an IPVC conference bridge you can't do any video
conferencing, just like without a CFB you can't do any voice
conferencing.

-Ryan

On Nov 18, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Tim Ritter wrote:

Is there a way to have a conference call and have multiple VT
advantage cameras come up?
or is VT advantage only point to point video?

Thanks
Tim
 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ****************************************
**************
This email may contain trade secrets and/or other information that is
proprietary and/or confidential. Use of this by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not
the intended recipient, delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
 ****************************************
**************


 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    RE: VT Advantage  
Voll, Scott


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
11-19-05 01:45 AM

Take your pick.  I think your looking at a minimum of a 3511.  But it
depends on what you want it to do.  I have an old 3510 that I don't
believe will would with CM.

I would also be interested in if Tanberg has anything.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: IT [mailto:it@cimgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 3:51 PM
To: Voll, Scott; IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

What is the minimum IPVC necessary to do a 3 or more VT advantage
stream?

-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:18 PM
To: IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

I do point to point with no problem with CM 4.1.  It's just if you want
3 or more streams that you need a IPVC.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of IT
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

You cant even do point-to-point 2 member vt advantage calls?
What is the minimum IPVC necessary to get VT advantages working?

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

Without an IPVC conference bridge you can't do any video
conferencing, just like without a CFB you can't do any voice
conferencing.

-Ryan

On Nov 18, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Tim Ritter wrote:

Is there a way to have a conference call and have multiple VT
advantage cameras come up?
or is VT advantage only point to point video?

Thanks
Tim
 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ****************************************
**************
This email may contain trade secrets and/or other information that is
proprietary and/or confidential. Use of this by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not
the intended recipient, delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
 ****************************************
**************


 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: VT Advantage  
Ryan Ratliff


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
11-20-05 10:45 PM

You need to have an EMP in your 3511 to do continuous presence with
VTA.  The MP will support continuous presence but only with H.261 and
the VTA only uses H.263.

-Ryan

On Nov 18, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Voll, Scott wrote:

Take your pick.  I think your looking at a minimum of a 3511.  But it
depends on what you want it to do.  I have an old 3510 that I don't
believe will would with CM.

I would also be interested in if Tanberg has anything.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: IT [mailto:it@cimgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 3:51 PM
To: Voll, Scott; IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

What is the minimum IPVC necessary to do a 3 or more VT advantage
stream?

-----Original Message-----
From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:18 PM
To: IT; Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

I do point to point with no problem with CM 4.1.  It's just if you want
3 or more streams that you need a IPVC.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of IT
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff; Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

You cant even do point-to-point 2 member vt advantage calls?
What is the minimum IPVC necessary to get VT advantages working?

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan Ratliff
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:55 AM
To: Tim Ritter
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VT Advantage

Without an IPVC conference bridge you can't do any video
conferencing, just like without a CFB you can't do any voice
conferencing.

-Ryan

On Nov 18, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Tim Ritter wrote:

Is there a way to have a conference call and have multiple VT
advantage cameras come up?
or is VT advantage only point to point video?

Thanks
Tim
 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ****************************************
**************
This email may contain trade secrets and/or other information that is
proprietary and/or confidential. Use of this by anyone other than the
intended recipient(s) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not
the intended recipient, delete the e-mail and notify us immediately.
 ****************************************
**************


 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip





[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 03:45 AM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register