12-10-05 07:49 AM
I apologize for not thanking you sooner! I actually have not yet been able t
o
test your answer, but I do believe you, you have the voice of authority and
besides, it explains the funny 401 responses I would usually see in the log
file (but not when ASP was strictly anonymous).
Mysteries like this are so baffling, thank goodness Microsoft has the gurus
to help us out. I'll be sure to tell all my lily livered Linux lover (LLLL)
cohorts that Microsoft is our friend!
--
-----
Glenn Nelson in Santa Cruz
"David Wang [Msft]" wrote:
> Not really an IIS issue.
>
> http://blogs.msdn.com/david.wang/ar...entication.aspx
>
> --
> //David
> IIS
> http://blogs.msdn.com/David.Wang
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
.
> //
> "Glenn Nelson" <GlennNelson@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:F5C6FB37-9218-42FF-996E-40B155A284D5@microsoft.com...
> I've encountered this very weird problem and am far from expert in IIS, so
I
> really need some help!
>
> Basic Config info:
> IIS 6.0 (clean install, not 5.1 upgrade)
> Windows 2003 Server
> ASP are enabled
> Logged into console as local User (although same behavior for Administrato
r)
> impersonate is true in web.config
>
> Works OK:
> Fillin form in 'htm' file, POST to 'asp' file, display the post params usi
ng
> VBScript.
> IIS security has anonymous enabled and also Integrated Windows auth.
> IIS security also grants READ and LOG only. Of course the website allows a
sp
> scripts.
>
> Does NOT Work:
> As above, but disable Integrated Windows, so only anonymous is enabled.
> The asp page output is OK, but displaying POST params shows me NOTHING. II
S
> logs look the same as successful case - it seems that IIS thinks the POST
> request was handled OK. I guess the asp simply did not receive any POST
> data.
>
> I've tried many variations on IIS file security and NTFS file system
> permissions. I don't know much about IIS debugging, what else can I try?
>
> TIA
> --
> -----
> Glenn Nelson in Santa Cruz
>
>
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|