I have dids configured on our cm that r configured to forward to an outside 
line. My question is if I call into that did from my cell and it forwards me
 to a ld.outside number. will that call tie up a port as long as the call is
 connected.  And will the c
harges go on our pri
James D. Grace
System Engineer
CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
Digitel Corp.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

That call will actually tie up two ports (incoming and outgoing) and yes
incur a charge.

Wouldn't it be nice if the Carrier's supported Q.SIG Anti-Trumboning ;)


-Mark Snow
CCIE Voice # 14073

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 7:44 PM
> To: CiscosupportUpuck
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Ccm forward call
>
> I have dids configured on our cm that r configured to forward to an
outside line.
> My question is if I call into that did from my cell and it forwards me to
a ld.outside
> number. will that call tie up a port as long as the call is connected.
And will the
> charges go on our pri
> James D. Grace
> System Engineer
> CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
> Digitel Corp.
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Of course path pruning would bring up obvious questions about who pays toll
rates once call control is released ;)

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 4:55 PM
To: 'James'; 'CiscosupportUpuck'
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Ccm forward call

That call will actually tie up two ports (incoming and outgoing) and yes
incur a charge.

Wouldn't it be nice if the Carrier's supported Q.SIG Anti-Trumboning ;)


-Mark Snow
CCIE Voice # 14073

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-
> bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 7:44 PM
> To: CiscosupportUpuck
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Ccm forward call
>
> I have dids configured on our cm that r configured to forward to an
outside line.
> My question is if I call into that did from my cell and it forwards me to
a ld.outside
> number. will that call tie up a port as long as the call is connected.
And will the
> charges go on our pri
> James D. Grace
> System Engineer
> CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
> Digitel Corp.
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Right, of course, *sigh*

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Nielsen [mailto:fwn@feasible.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 7:59 PM
> To: 'Mark Snow'; 'James'; 'CiscosupportUpuck'
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Ccm forward call
>
> Of course path pruning would bring up obvious questions about who pays
toll
> rates once call control is released ;)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 4:55 PM
> To: 'James'; 'CiscosupportUpuck'
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Ccm forward call
>
> That call will actually tie up two ports (incoming and outgoing) and yes
> incur a charge.
>
> Wouldn't it be nice if the Carrier's supported Q.SIG Anti-Trumboning ;)
>
>
> -Mark Snow
> CCIE Voice # 14073
> 
> outside line. 
to[vbcol=seagreen]
> a ld.outside 
> And will the 
>
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Personally, I think it should be up to the last redirecting party that shoul
d pay the toll. Let's say a client calls me, and I've forwarded my office ph
one to my cottage. Why should the client pay the toll? It was me who made th
e decision to play hookie. The same goes for transfering calls. 

We've had a request for people to forward their phones off-campus and have h
ad to restrict that to local calls only because of the ways CDRs are cut. If
 we have more requests we're going to have to work with our CDR billing firm
 to make sure they follow through on the CDR and catch those. A bit of a pai
n if you ask me.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Mark Snow 
To: 'Fred Nielsen' ; 'James' ; 'CiscosupportUpuck' 
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 11:50 PM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Ccm forward call


Right, of course, *sigh*

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Nielsen [mailto:fwn@feasible.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 7:59 PM
> To: 'Mark Snow'; 'James'; 'CiscosupportUpuck'
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Ccm forward call
> 
> Of course path pruning would bring up obvious questions about who pays
toll
> rates once call control is released ;)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Snow
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 4:55 PM
> To: 'James'; 'CiscosupportUpuck'
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Ccm forward call
> 
> That call will actually tie up two ports (incoming and outgoing) and yes
> incur a charge.
> 
> Wouldn't it be nice if the Carrier's supported Q.SIG Anti-Trumboning ;)
> 
> 
> -Mark Snow
> CCIE Voice # 14073
>  
> outside line. 
to[vbcol=seagreen]
> a ld.outside 
> And will the 
> 
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Attachment:
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]