Hi!

here is my configuration

A read/write intranet MCMS site, on a domain.
Accessing the site with Internet Explorer, everything is fine, the
windows-user is automatically detected.

But when accessing the site with firefox, i'am always prompted to enter a
domain user name/pwd. Indicating the same user, it's then work fine.

Is there a way to disable this prompting with firefox, without enambling
anonymous acces in IIS?

thanks !

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hello Dref,

as far as I know Firefox is not able to do Windows Authentication
automatically. Only IE can. I think the only possibility for Firefox is to
have anonymous access or to switch to another form of login (forms based for
example).

Cheers,
Dominik

"dref" wrote:

> Hi!
>
> here is my configuration
>
> A read/write intranet MCMS site, on a domain.
> Accessing the site with Internet Explorer, everything is fine, the
> windows-user is automatically detected.
>
> But when accessing the site with firefox, i'am always prompted to enter a
> domain user name/pwd. Indicating the same user, it's then work fine.
>
> Is there a way to disable this prompting with firefox, without enambling
> anonymous acces in IIS?
>
> thanks !
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Dominik,

Firefox can use Basic authentication as well.

Cheers,
Stefan

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights

New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
Check out the new book as well: Advanced MCMS development:
http://tinyurl.com/8ugwj
----------------------


"Dominik" <Dominik@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:ABF0A23A-0D73-48A4-8035-12E949C9C32C@microsoft.com...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Hello Dref,
>
> as far as I know Firefox is not able to do Windows Authentication
> automatically. Only IE can. I think the only possibility for Firefox is to
> have anonymous access or to switch to another form of login (forms based
> for
> example).
>
> Cheers,
> Dominik
>
> "dref" wrote:
> 

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]