Hi,

I have a situation where i want 2 postings to share 1 HTML
placeholder(Connected) but not share the rest of the HTML and image
placeholders.
For eg - The logo image is common, and a greeting HTML placeholder is common
but not the rest of the placeholders.
Doable in CMS?

Vivek

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Hi Vivek,

it is not possible to share only a single placeholder.
But what you could do is to render the content of a remote placeholder on
your posting.
This can be done using the following control:
http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/...b9-8b395b722f24

Cheers,
Stefan

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights

New to MCMS?
Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44
Check out the new book as well: Advanced MCMS development:
http://tinyurl.com/8ugwj
----------------------


"vjammy" <vjammy@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:DBB6C0BF-E255-4E04-A627-9E9A6BE45099@microsoft.com...
> Hi,
>
> I have a situation where i want 2 postings to share 1 HTML
> placeholder(Connected) but not share the rest of the HTML and image
> placeholders.
> For eg - The logo image is common, and a greeting HTML placeholder is
> common
> but not the rest of the placeholders.
> Doable in CMS?
>
> Vivek

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Thanks stefan,

I'll check this control out.

"Stefan [MSFT]" wrote:

> Hi Vivek,
>
> it is not possible to share only a single placeholder.
> But what you could do is to render the content of a remote placeholder on
> your posting.
> This can be done using the following control:
> http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/...b9-8b395b722f24
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights
>
> New to MCMS?
> Check out this book: Building Websites Using MCMS: http://tinyurl.com/6zj44[/url...nyurl.com/8ugwj
> ----------------------
>
>
> "vjammy" <vjammy@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:DBB6C0BF-E255-4E04-A627-9E9A6BE45099@microsoft.com... 
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]