Updated: (MODPYTHON-94) Calling APR optional functions provided by mod_ssl
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Web Servers reviews > Apache Server configuration support > Apache Mod-Python > Updated: (MODPYTHON-94) Calling APR optional functions provided by mod_ssl




  Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    Updated: (MODPYTHON-94) Calling APR optional functions provided by mod_ssl  
Nicolas Lehuen (JIRA)


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
12-28-05 10:49 PM

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...HON-94?page=all ]

Nicolas Lehuen updated MODPYTHON-94:
------------------------------------

Fix Version: 3.3
Version:     (was: 3.2)

> Calling APR optional functions provided by mod_ssl
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MODPYTHON-94
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-94
>      Project: mod_python
>         Type: New Feature
>   Components: core
>  Environment: Apache 2
>     Reporter: Deron Meranda
>      Fix For: 3.3
>  Attachments: modpython4.tex.patch, requestobject.c.patch
>
> mod_python is not able to invoke APR Optional Functions.  There are
> some cases however where this could be of great benifit.
> For example, consider writing an authentication or authorization handler
> which needs to determine SSL properties (even if to just answer the
> simple question: is the connection SSL encrypted).  The normal way of
> looking in the subprocess_env for SSL_* variables does not work in those
> early handler phases because those variables are not set until the fixup p
hase.
> The mod_ssl module though does provide both a ssl_is_https() and
> ssl_var_lookup() optional functions which can be used in earlier
> phases.  For example look at how mod_rewrite calls those; using
> the APR_DECLARE_OPTIONAL_FN and APR_RETRIEVE_OPTIONAL_FN
> macros.
> I can see how it might be very hard to support optional functions in
> general because of the C type linkage issue, but perhaps a select few
> could be coded directly into mod_python.






[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 12:54 AM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
  Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register