[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...ON-107?page=all ]

Jim Gallacher resolved MODPYTHON-107:
-------------------------------------

Fix Version: 3.2
Resolution: Fixed

> mod_python.publisher shouldn't flush result when written.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: MODPYTHON-107
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-107
>      Project: mod_python
>         Type: Improvement
>   Components: publisher
>     Versions: 3.2
>     Reporter: Graham Dumpleton
>      Fix For: 3.2

>
> In mod_python.publisher, the result returned from a published function is 
returned as the content of the response after it has been converted to a str
ing, using:
>   req.write(result)
> In doing this, the second argument of req.write() is defaulting to '1', wh
ich indicates that the output should be flushed immediately.
> This fact prevents an output filter like CONTENT_LENGTH being used in conj
unction with mod_python.publisher.
> This output filter will add a content length header to the response, but only if i
t is able to read the full content the first time the output filter is called. Becau
se the output is flushed at this point, the output filter isn't able to do that, as 
it
gets called twice. The first time it gets called will be with the actual content, the second
 time happens when the handler returns apache.OK and is effectively a null output call to fo
rce the output filter to be closed off.
> If instead the output is written as:
>   req.write(result,0)
> the output will not be flushed immediately and instead will be output in o
ne call when apache.OK is returned. There is no loss of efficiency in doing 
this and instead it will actually eliminate a redundant call into the output
 filter.
> For further details of this issue see discussion in:
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/python-...g/msg00951.html
> This makes one wander if there should be a configurable option for mod_python.psp 
to tell it not to flush output as well so that CONTENT_LENGTH could be used in that 
case as well. ???

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]