[VOTE] Release jdo2 beta
Web Server forum
Back To The Forum Home!Search!Private Messaging System

Web Server Talk Web Server Talk > Web Servers reviews > Apache Server configuration support > Apache JDO Project > [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta




Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread Next
  Show Printable Version Email this Page Subscribe to this Thread      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      

    [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Craig L Russell


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-14-06 10:45 PM






[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Jean T. Anderson


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-14-06 10:45 PM

Craig L Russell wrote:
> Javadogs,
>
> I'd like to propose that we release jdo2 beta based on the current code
> in the svn repository and a few minor changes.
>
> 1. JDO-278 Change the group ids for the project from apache-jdo to
>
> org.apache.jdo for the non-API projects
> javax.jdo for the API projects.

Craig,

This might be a dumb question (especially since I mostly lurk on this
list and rarely pay attention to the posts that go by), but will a
javax.jdo package be part of the Apache JDO release? And, if so, is
using "javax.jdo" acceptable given these posts?

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod...
l.gmail.com%3e
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod...319@lyra.org%3e

Those are just two posts from a long, tangled thread. "javax.jdo" might
be fine, but questions might be raised.

-jean

>
> 2. Change the version on all projects to 2.0-beta. This can be changed
> when we make the JDO-278 changes.
>
> 3. JDO-279 Distribute the tck20 as a source distribution and the other
> components as downloadable binary components. These would go into the
> apache maven repository at www.apache.org/dist/java-repository
> <http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository>.
>
> I'd like to have everyone's vote by Thursday 18-Jan-2006.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> Craig Russell
>
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>







[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Craig L Russell


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-14-06 10:45 PM






[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Jean T. Anderson


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-14-06 10:45 PM

Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> On Jan 14, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Jean T. Anderson wrote: 
> Excellent question. We are using the org.apache.jdo package name (and
> group id) for everything in this project except for the API jars which
> are part of the specification and therefore must be named javax.jdo.
>
> These two jars are similar to the javax.jmx and other similar
> geronimo-spec jars that are specified as part of the Java platform not
> simply an implementation. We had originally used the apache-jdo group id
> for the APIs even though they were all javax.jdo classes and interfaces.
> And thought that this was confusing.
> ...
> I hope this answers your question.

It does. Thanks,

-jean






[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Daniel John Debrunner


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-15-06 01:45 AM

Craig L Russell wrote:
> Javadogs,
>
> I'd like to propose that we release jdo2 beta based on the current code
> in the svn repository and a few minor changes.
>
> 1. JDO-278 Change the group ids for the project from apache-jdo to
>
> org.apache.jdo for the non-API projects
> javax.jdo for the API projects.
>
> 2. Change the version on all projects to 2.0-beta. This can be changed
> when we make the JDO-278 changes.
>
> 3. JDO-279 Distribute the tck20 as a source distribution and the other
> components as downloadable binary components. These would go into the
> apache maven repository at www.apache.org/dist/java-repository
> <http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository>.
>
> I'd like to have everyone's vote by Thursday 18-Jan-2006.

I'm a little confused on what we are voting on here. Is this a vote to
start a release process or a vote on releasing binaries (jar files)?

Normally (I thought) a release vote was on an actual download that
people could test etc.

Dan.







[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Wes Biggs


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-15-06 01:45 AM

Vote in favor.

Wes

Craig L Russell wrote:

> Javadogs,
>
> I'd like to propose that we release jdo2 beta based on the current
> code in the svn repository and a few minor changes.
>
> 1. JDO-278 Change the group ids for the project from apache-jdo to
>
> org.apache.jdo for the non-API projects
> javax.jdo for the API projects.
>
> 2. Change the version on all projects to 2.0-beta. This can be changed
> when we make the JDO-278 changes.
>
> 3. JDO-279 Distribute the tck20 as a source distribution and the other
> components as downloadable binary components. These would go into the
> apache maven repository at www.apache.org/dist/java-repository
> <http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository>.
>
> I'd like to have everyone's vote by Thursday 18-Jan-2006.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> Craig Russell
>
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>







[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Craig L Russell


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-15-06 01:45 AM






[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Daniel John Debrunner


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-15-06 07:45 AM

Craig L Russell wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thanks for the advice. This is my first release.
>
> What we are trying to release is several jar files from the jdo2 project
> plus a source download. I'll stage these on my apache.org/~clr site
> along with instructions on what to do with them.

I'm not sure what you mean here, Apache releases are distributed from
Apache mirrors, not from people's home directories on Apache servers.

> Since the tck is a requirement for claiming compatibility with JSR 243,
> we need to distribute its sources. But the rest of the dependencies are
> distributed as binaries accessible via maven.
>
> So what would you like to see here? We've started the release process,
> and need a vote to make the components available on the Apache web site.
> Clearly I can make the binaries available as a maven repository in my
> ~clr web site but the other part is the process of getting people
> comfortable with the release process itself.

When Derby was getting started I found the HTTP server release
guidelines very useful:

http://httpd.apache.org/dev/release.html

The HTTP guidelines do talk about source only as a release, but with
Java projects you don't have the issue of multiple binaries, so a
release can include the binary (jar files as well).

Derby has a release process on its wiki:

http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbySnapshotOrRelease

I think the point is that a release is what the JDO project wants to
distribute through the Apache mirrors. People need to vote on the actual
tar/zip that will be posted, not just on a state of the svn respository.
For example Derby had some issues with a release where something like
the scripts files bundled in the jar files did not have execute
permission, something that was obvious when people tried out the release
to-be, but maybe not from svn.

Hope this helps,
Dan.








[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Craig L Russell


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-15-06 10:45 PM






[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Re: [VOTE] Release jdo2 beta  
Michael Bouschen


View Ip Address Report This Message To A Moderator Edit/Delete Message


 
01-16-06 12:45 PM

Hi Craig,

I vote in favor.

Regards Michael

> Javadogs,
>
> I'd like to propose that we release jdo2 beta based on the current code
> in the svn repository and a few minor changes.
>
> 1. JDO-278 Change the group ids for the project from apache-jdo to
>
> org.apache.jdo for the non-API projects
> javax.jdo for the API projects.
>
> 2. Change the version on all projects to 2.0-beta. This can be changed
> when we make the JDO-278 changes.
>
> 3. JDO-279 Distribute the tck20 as a source distribution and the other
> components as downloadable binary components. These would go into the
> apache maven repository at www.apache.org/dist/java-repository
> <http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository>.
>
> I'd like to have everyone's vote by Thursday 18-Jan-2006.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> Craig Russell
>
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>


--
Michael Bouschen		Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de	http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33		Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012		D-10783 Berlin






[ Post a follow-up to this message ]



    Sponsored Links  




 





   All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 PM.      Post New Thread    Post A Reply      
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread Next


Most Popular forums 

Forum Jump:
Rate This Thread:

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is OFF
 
Medical and Health forum | Computer Games Reviews | Graphics design forum

Back To The Top
Home | Usercp | Faq | Register