-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I'm pleased to announce that the Pboxmix
mixmaster remailer ended the testing
phase and is now in production.

It is for sure the smallest remailer in
the world!   ;)

Due to a interesting discussion in APAS
(strange, isn't it?) I want to info
all interested people that this remailer
has one remop in common with other two
remailer of the Winston Smith Project,
Starwars & Antani.

Oh, I forget, and has no common operator
with CoS and other TLA's remailer.

Cheers.  Pboxmix admin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDyQoTu65qnw89qTYRAq/xAJ4o5GiPocQGIp4f8y6srunl54+/xgCffWl8
6BE+qLlV4AXmsoewSAn1jnA=
=4B5l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <1137249237.966596.317890@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
"marcoc" <marcoc@dada.it> wrote:
>
> Oh, I forget, and has no common operator
>  with CoS and other TLA's remailer.

Yeah yeah, that's exactly what a TLA or CoS operative _would_ say ;)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Of course.

Let WSP reputation act by itself.

Trust is a strange thing .....

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 14 Jan 2006 19:01:53 -0000, TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
 
>
>
>
>
>Here's a lame idea... as a matter a fact I'm gunna give myself a SHUT UP
>ELLBASH right off the bat :-)... but, would it make any difference if
>remailer operators were "asked" to post a "legalish" statement that they
>were not working in co-operation with any police, domestic security
>agency, international security agency, etc. If they did publish such a
>statement, would it make it even somewhat difficult for them to then use
>any information they discovered in a subsequent legal proceeding? I
>realize remailers operate under completely different legal systems in
>different countries, but in some countries it might (I'm guessing here) be
>
>
>a real problem for TLA remops to make such a claim as it could put thier
>ultimate prosecution of who ever they are trying to catch at risk. A
>non-TLA remop on the other hand would likely have no problem with
>publishing a simple statement that he is not associated with such an
>organization.
>

Hmm, I thought of that too. I did add it to my help file under


1.0 Disclaimer:

This re-mailer is operated by a private individual. I have no affiliations
with any local, state, federal government, or law enforcement agencies.
By this statement, I am assuring you that I am not in any way connected
with
any such agencies. I will not knowingly nor willingly co-operate with any
agency that would corrupt the re-mailer system.

The re-mailer PC is operated directly from my home. It is not located
off site to prevent possible compromise of the system.

Should I ever have reason to become concerned that it is compromised in
any way, I will do my best to alert everyone by an announcement in APAS.

Ultimately it is your decision to use or not use this re-mailer.




You can see it at: http://pinger.bananasplit.info/thesaurus/106.help

Not that anyone would care, but there was a lot of talk abut re-mailers
being TLA. I was PGP signing the help file, but it has changed with
changing times. I want to be open about how the re-mailer is operated. The
users have some rights to know. I got lazy and stopped signing it, some
people told me it wasn't necesssary.

Regards All,
TwistyCreek Admin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQA/ AwUBQ8lUov9qPDhkRaWyEQK04QCfUd2JNnzNnulX
msXHi3/oMgin/PYAni6a
rUCAWHwQq7DgIj7joRpoa4EO
=YYd5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

TwistyCreek wrote:
 
>
>
>
>
> Here's a lame idea... as a matter a fact I'm gunna give myself a SHUT UP
> ELLBASH right off the bat :-)... but, would it make any difference if
> remailer operators were "asked" to post a "legalish" statement that they
> were not working in co-operation with any police, domestic security
> agency, international security agency, etc. If they did publish such a

I doubt it. I believe in most jurisdictions it's been determined they have
the legal right to lie to you. Like a US drug agent going under cover and
telling all the paranoid users he's not a drug agent. I doubt you'd find
the situation much different anywhere else.

So... SHUT UP EELBASH!

<grinning>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]