01-28-06 02:03 AM
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
: Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
: > I think they did.
: Can I see your thinking license, please?
: > See 200601242007.k0OK7wFU019619@sdf.lonestar.org
: > and 200601242121.k0OLLkLs022758@sdf.lonestar.org
: Both reached my newsserver from lcs' mail2news:
: news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
The dizum mailq contained 70K messages or so, so turn around
times were slow. It seems LCS posted the message befor dizum
did and therefor the dizum messages were rejected by 'usenet'
as being duplicates.
The turn around times should be back to normal again ..
: > Also you were replying to a post concerning Dizum, not Cotse.
: Exactly. Dizum, not lcs.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|