02-29-04 04:34 AM
Hi dwc
You have valid points. However, the recommended solution from MS does not
take into account sites that are mission critical and require information to
be updated the moment it becomes available, especially intranet apps.
Trevor
"dwc" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:FC7BBE32-2FF5-475C-B3EF-0B8F757A5312@microsoft.com...
> For the record, I think sharing a CMS database between your authoring
server and your production server is a very bad idea. The host header issue
is something I would steer clear of altogether. Also, you will run into
more issues than just host header mapping. For example, if you change the
standard properties on a published posting, that posting is taken out of
publication until the standard properties are approved. This is because the
edit and live versions share their standard properties.
>
> The Microsoft reccommended solution for a production environment is to
have at least one authoring server and one publishing server each with their
own database. Then you can automate content deployment from one server to
the other with the MCMS Site Deployment API, either in vbscript or in your
application itself.
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|