Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
 
>
>This is the only one that makes sense in my opinion. It is short and
>informative enough.
>
>
> 
>
>None of them sound right. I do not think you need to say that is a
>codec-filter, you just need to say it is a bridge between mina and
>netty. The details of the implementation do not need to be transparent
>on the name of the artefact.
>
>So something like:
> <artifactId>mina-netty</artifactId>
>
>Should be good enough.
>
>

Exactly, re: "The details of the implementation do not need to be
transparent

on the name of the artifact."

In the same light other modules like the ans1 and ssl modules not have filte
r or codec added to the artifactId.  There should be documentation on the si
te or a README/README.layout file in mina top level that can explain the det
ails if people have any que
stions.

We are going to far ... playing with these names.  Let's add a readme, short
en the names and let's stabilize.

Alex

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]