01-25-06 01:45 AM
+1. Looks good!
-- Michelle
Craig L Russell wrote:
> The distribution of the tck source posted on 20-Jan-2006 was flawed,
> as discovered during testing of the bits from the site. The RunRules
> were confused and the distribution was missing a file necessary to
> test an IUT.
>
> The rest of the distribution passed the testing and has not been changed.
>
> I've uploaded new bits for the tck distribution to
> http://people.apache.org/~clr/downl...24_Jan_2006.zip
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eclr/dow...24_Jan_2006.zip>.
> The date on the file was changed.
>
> Since the bits were changed, I'll hold the voting open until Friday
> morning 27-Jan-2006. If you previously voted to release the
> distribution and you agree with the new distribution, you need not do
> anything. If you previously voted to release and change your mind,
> please reply.
>
> Craig
>
>
> Craig Russell
>
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|