I was told that I need to configure transcoding on my srst gw. And not sure
way. Is this really needed.  And if I set up a media resource groups for my
srst site, the available resources are on the cms at the main site.  So the
question is if I create one for srst and use the avil resource isn't that
the same as using none or the default



James D. Grace

CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA

Sr. System Engineer / Professional Svc.

Digitel Corporation

Attachment:
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

What is the reason for having transcoding on your SRST gw?

 

If your in SRST you would be using the PSTN.  

 

Scott

 

________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Grace
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:37 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw 

 

I was told that I need to configure transcoding on my srst gw. And not
sure  way. Is this really needed.  And if I set up a media resource
groups for my srst site, the available resources are on the cms at the
main site.  So the question is if I create one for srst and use the avil
resource isn't that the same as using none or the default 

 

James D. Grace 

CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA

Sr. System Engineer / Professional Svc.

Digitel Corporation

 

Attachment:
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Ok   well the concern is that all call are working fine. Even thou we do not
see the dialpeer.  So we are clueless on how calls are going out with out
the dial peer.  We know that they are going out the right gw but doing
debugs q931 921



_____

From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 5:21 PM
To: James Grace
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw



I think your other engineer is right.  But I don't have any doc's to back it
up.



I know on my 3640 with PRI I put in a pots dial peer of  9991024 as my PRI
is in slot1 port 0.



dial-peer voice 9991024 pots

destination-pattern 9T

incoming called-number .

direct-inward-dial



I do remember manually putting it in.



Scott



Sorry, it's been years.



_____

From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:48 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw



Hey Voll you seem to have all the answers.  So I thank you for all the
help..   I have a question that me and another engineer have a issue with.
Can you explain to me or help me understand why   on a mgcp gw,  we do not
see a dial peer in the config for the pri endpoint ( like you would see
after confuring fxo and fxs end points in cm)  and how would I explain why
there isn't suppose to be one in the cli conf.  my other engineer seems to
thing that you should add one manully to the cli gw



_____

From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:19 PM
To: James Grace
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw



But is the conference calling resource at the remote site or the central
site.  If it's at the central site then the transcoding is just need at the
central site.  Now if the conference calling resource is at the remote site,
yes you will need transcoding at the remote site.



Scott



_____

From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:56 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw



Yes we are doing conf call internal at the srst and conf calling between the
srst and main.



_____

From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:36 AM
To: James Grace
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw



James-



You are going to setup regions to your remote sites so you can use G729.
That I understand.  Do you have some kind of resource at the remote site
that only does G711 that you're other sites need to get too?  That would be
the only reason I can think of for needing transcoding resources at the
remote site.



I have transcoding resources at the central site because I have IPCCx that
only does G711.  So if a remote site is using G729 the central site
transcodes it to G711 so they can make the call to the IPCCx pilot point.



Are you doing conferencing calling resources at the remote site that would
require transcoding at the remote site?



Scott







_____

From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:25 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw



First thanks for the reply



I was told that i need to set up region for srst with codec 7.29 and set up
transcoding on the srst gw to dedicate a few dsp fo r transcoding



_____

From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:03 AM
To: James Grace; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw



What is the reason for having transcoding on your SRST gw?



If your in SRST you would be using the PSTN.



Scott



_____

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Grace
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:37 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw



I was told that I need to configure transcoding on my srst gw. And not sure
way. Is this really needed.  And if I set up a media resource groups for my
srst site, the available resources are on the cms at the main site.  So the
question is if I create one for srst and use the avil resource isn't that
the same as using none or the default



James D. Grace

CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA

Sr. System Engineer / Professional Svc.

Digitel Corporation

Attachment:
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

You are matching the default dial peer which is hidden.  Please read  
the following:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/ 
technologies_tech_note09186a008010fed1.shtml

Kevin
On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:57 PM, James Grace wrote:

>
> Ok __well the concern is that all call are working fine. Even thou we  
> do not see the dialpeer._ So we are clueless on how calls are going  
> out with out the dial peer._ We know that they are going out the right  
> gw but doing debugs q931 921
> _
>
> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 5:21 PM
> To: James Grace
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
> _
> I think your other engineer is right._ But I don’t have any doc’s to  
> back it up.
> _
> I know on my 3640 with PRI I put in a pots dial peer of _9991024 as my  
> PRI is in slot1 port 0.
> _
> dial-peer voice 9991024 pots
> _destination-pattern 9T
> _incoming called-number .
> _direct-inward-dial
> _
> I do remember manually putting it in._
> _
> Scott
> _
> Sorry, it’s been years.
> _
>
> From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:48 AM
> To: Voll, Scott
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
> _
> Hey Voll you seem to have all the answers._ So I thank you for all the  
> help..__ I have a question that me and another engineer have a issue  
> with._ Can you explain to me or help me understand why__ on a mgcp  
> gw,_ we do not see a dial peer in the config for the pri endpoint (  
> like you would see after confuring fxo and fxs end points in cm) _and  
> how would I explain why there isn’t suppose to be one in the cli  
> conf._ my other engineer seems to thing that you should add one  
> manully to the cli gw
> _
>
> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:19 PM
> To: James Grace
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
> _
> But is the conference calling resource at the remote site or the  
> central site._ If it’s at the central site then the transcoding is  
> just need at the central site._ Now if the conference calling resource  
> is at the remote site, yes you will need transcoding at the remote  
> site.
> _
> Scott
> _
>
> From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:56 AM
> To: Voll, Scott
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
> _
> Yes we are doing conf call internal at the srst and conf calling  
> between the srst and main._
> _
>
> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:36 AM
> To: James Grace
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
> _
> James—
> _
> You are going to setup regions to your remote sites so you can use  
> G729._ That I understand._ Do you have some kind of resource at the  
> remote site that only does G711 that you’re other sites need to get  
> too?_ That would be the only reason I can think of for needing  
> transcoding resources at the remote site._
> _
> I have transcoding resources at the central site because I have IPCCx  
> that only does G711._ So if a remote site is using G729 the central  
> site transcodes it to G711 so they can make the call to the IPCCx  
> pilot point.
> _
> Are you doing conferencing calling resources at the remote site that  
> would require transcoding at the remote site?
> _
> Scott
> _
> _
> _
>
> From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:25 AM
> To: Voll, Scott
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
> _
> First thanks for the reply
> _
> I was told that i need to set up region for srst with codec 7.29 and  
> set up transcoding on the srst gw to dedicate a few dsp fo r  
> transcoding
> _
>
> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:03 AM
> To: James Grace; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
> _
> What is the reason for having transcoding on your SRST gw?
> _
> If your in SRST you would be using the PSTN._
> _
> Scott
> _
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net  
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Grace
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:37 AM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
> _
> I was told that I need to configure transcoding on my srst gw. And not  
> sure_ way. Is this really needed._ And if I set up a media resource  
> groups for my srst site, the available resources are on the cms at the  
> main site._ So the question is if I create one for srst and use the  
> avil resource isn’t that the same as using none or the default
> _
> James D. Grace
> CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
> Sr. System Engineer / Professional Svc.
> Digitel Corporation
> _
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Attachment:
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

I responded too quickly, too late in the evening :-)  The default dial  
peer is matched for inbound calls.  Try using "debug voip ccapi inout"  
to see what is happening with the call.  Maybe we can take a look at  
this along with your config (sanitize as needed).

Kevin
On Jan 26, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Kevin Thorngren wrote:

> You are matching the default dial peer which is hidden.  Please read  
> the following:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/ 
> technologies_tech_note09186a008010fed1.shtml
>
> Kevin
> On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:57 PM, James Grace wrote:
> 
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Attachment:
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

I noticed that the normal dial-peers with "application MGCPAPP" disappeared
I think when I first put 12.3 on a router.  Is it possible MGCP with
config-download now tucks itself on the default peer?


_____

From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Thorngren
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 7:03 PM
To: James Grace
Cc: CiscosupportUpuck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw


I responded too quickly, too late in the evening :-) The default dial peer
is matched for inbound calls. Try using "debug voip ccapi inout" to see what
is happening with the call. Maybe we can take a look at this along with your
config (sanitize as needed).

Kevin
On Jan 26, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Kevin Thorngren wrote:



You are matching the default dial peer which is hidden. Please read the
following:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk6...note09186a00801
0fed1.shtml

Kevin
On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:57 PM, James Grace wrote:




Ok   well the concern is that all call are working fine. Even thou we do not
see the dialpeer.  So we are clueless on how calls are going out with out
the dial peer.  We know that they are going out the right gw but doing
debugs q931 921


From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 5:21 PM
To: James Grace
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw

I think your other engineer is right.  But I don't have any doc's to back it
up.

I know on my 3640 with PRI I put in a pots dial peer of  9991024 as my PRI
is in slot1 port 0.

dial-peer voice 9991024 pots
destination-pattern 9T
incoming called-number .
direct-inward-dial

I do remember manually putting it in.

Scott

Sorry, it's been years.


From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:48 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw

Hey Voll you seem to have all the answers.  So I thank you for all the
help..   I have a question that me and another engineer have a issue with.
Can you explain to me or help me understand why   on a mgcp gw,  we do not
see a dial peer in the config for the pri endpoint ( like you would see
after confuring fxo and fxs end points in cm)  and how would I explain why
there isn't suppose to be one in the cli conf.  my other engineer seems to
thing that you should add one manully to the cli gw


From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:19 PM
To: James Grace
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw

But is the conference calling resource at the remote site or the central
site.  If it's at the central site then the transcoding is just need at the
central site.  Now if the conference calling resource is at the remote site,
yes you will need transcoding at the remote site.

Scott


From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:56 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw

Yes we are doing conf call internal at the srst and conf calling between the
srst and main.


From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:36 AM
To: James Grace
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw

James-

You are going to setup regions to your remote sites so you can use G729.
That I understand.  Do you have some kind of resource at the remote site
that only does G711 that you're other sites need to get too?  That would be
the only reason I can think of for needing transcoding resources at the
remote site.

I have transcoding resources at the central site because I have IPCCx that
only does G711.  So if a remote site is using G729 the central site
transcodes it to G711 so they can make the call to the IPCCx pilot point.

Are you doing conferencing calling resources at the remote site that would
require transcoding at the remote site?

Scott




From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:25 AM
To: Voll, Scott
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw

First thanks for the reply

I was told that i need to set up region for srst with codec 7.29 and set up
transcoding on the srst gw to dedicate a few dsp fo r transcoding


From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:03 AM
To: James Grace; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw

What is the reason for having transcoding on your SRST gw?

If your in SRST you would be using the PSTN.

Scott


From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of James Grace
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:37 AM
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw

I was told that I need to configure transcoding on my srst gw. And not sure
way. Is this really needed.  And if I set up a media resource groups for my
srst site, the available resources are on the cms at the main site.  So the
question is if I create one for srst and use the avil resource isn't that
the same as using none or the default

James D. Grace
CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
Sr. System Engineer / Professional Svc.
Digitel Corporation

 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


 ________________________________________
_______
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Attachment:
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

With PRIs, 'application mgcpapp' isn't needed on the
PRI pots dial-peers. There is a bug id documenting
this (I would need to dig through my notepad to find
it if you need it). This changed in 12.3T at some
point. Analog endpoints work differently (no
signalling channel that can be backhauled to call
manager). 12.3(14)T and higher, application mgcpapp
was replaced with service mgcpapp and global
application config section. You would need pots
dial-peer with PRI port under them if you were using
PRI in fallback/SRST though.

--- Philip Walenta <pwalenta@wi.rr.com> wrote:

> I noticed that the normal dial-peers with
> "application MGCPAPP" disappeared
> I think when I first put 12.3 on a router.  Is it
> possible MGCP with
> config-download now tucks itself on the default
> peer?
>
>
>   _____
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On
> Behalf Of Kevin Thorngren
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 7:03 PM
> To: James Grace
> Cc: CiscosupportUpuck <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>
>
> I responded too quickly, too late in the evening :-)
> The default dial peer
> is matched for inbound calls. Try using "debug voip
> ccapi inout" to see what
> is happening with the call. Maybe we can take a look
> at this along with your
> config (sanitize as needed).
>
> Kevin
> On Jan 26, 2006, at 7:53 PM, Kevin Thorngren wrote:
>
>
>
> You are matching the default dial peer which is
> hidden. Please read the
> following:
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk6...note09186a00801
> 0fed1.shtml
>
> Kevin
> On Jan 26, 2005, at 5:57 PM, James Grace wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Ok   well the concern is that all call are working
> fine. Even thou we do not
> see the dialpeer.  So we are clueless on how calls
> are going out with out
> the dial peer.  We know that they are going out the
> right gw but doing
> debugs q931 921
>
>
> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 5:21 PM
> To: James Grace
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>
> I think your other engineer is right.  But I don't
> have any doc's to back it
> up.
>
> I know on my 3640 with PRI I put in a pots dial peer
> of  9991024 as my PRI
> is in slot1 port 0.
>
> dial-peer voice 9991024 pots
>  destination-pattern 9T
>  incoming called-number .
>  direct-inward-dial
>
> I do remember manually putting it in.
>
> Scott
>
> Sorry, it's been years.
>
>
> From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:48 AM
> To: Voll, Scott
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>
> Hey Voll you seem to have all the answers.  So I
> thank you for all the
> help..   I have a question that me and another
> engineer have a issue with.
> Can you explain to me or help me understand why   on
> a mgcp gw,  we do not
> see a dial peer in the config for the pri endpoint (
> like you would see
> after confuring fxo and fxs end points in cm)  and
> how would I explain why
> there isn't suppose to be one in the cli conf.  my
> other engineer seems to
> thing that you should add one manully to the cli gw
>
>
> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 12:19 PM
> To: James Grace
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>
> But is the conference calling resource at the remote
> site or the central
> site.  If it's at the central site then the
> transcoding is just need at the
> central site.  Now if the conference calling
> resource is at the remote site,
> yes you will need transcoding at the remote site.
>
> Scott
>
>
> From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:56 AM
> To: Voll, Scott
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>
> Yes we are doing conf call internal at the srst and
> conf calling between the
> srst and main.
>
>
> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:36 AM
> To: James Grace
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>
> James-
>
> You are going to setup regions to your remote sites
> so you can use G729.
> That I understand.  Do you have some kind of
> resource at the remote site
> that only does G711 that you're other sites need to
> get too?  That would be
> the only reason I can think of for needing
> transcoding resources at the
> remote site.
>
> I have transcoding resources at the central site
> because I have IPCCx that
> only does G711.  So if a remote site is using G729
> the central site
> transcodes it to G711 so they can make the call to
> the IPCCx pilot point.
>
> Are you doing conferencing calling resources at the
> remote site that would
> require transcoding at the remote site?
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> From: James Grace [mailto:jgrace@digitelusa.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 8:25 AM
> To: Voll, Scott
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>
> First thanks for the reply
>
> I was told that i need to set up region for srst
> with codec 7.29 and set up
> transcoding on the srst gw to dedicate a few dsp fo
> r transcoding
>
>
> From: Voll, Scott [mailto:Scott.Voll@wesd.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 11:03 AM
> To: James Grace; cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>
> What is the reason for having transcoding on your
> SRST gw?
>
> If your in SRST you would be using the PSTN.
>
> Scott
>
>
> From: cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces@puck.nether.net] On
> Behalf Of James Grace
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:37 AM
> To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] transcoding on srst gw
>
> I was told that I need to configure transcoding on
> my srst gw. And not sure
> way. Is this really needed.  And if I set up a media
> resource groups for my
> srst site, the available resources are on the cms at
> the main site.  So the
> question is if I create one for srst and use the
> avil resource isn't that
> the same as using none or the default
>
> James D. Grace
> CCNP CCNA MCSE MCDBA
> Sr. System Engineer / Professional Svc.
> Digitel Corporation
>
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>  ________________________________________
_______
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> 
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


 ________________________________________
__________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]