I'm processing some messages using BizTalk 2004 using CBR (no
orchestrations).  I have a SQL Send Port that is subscribed to incoming
messages based on receive port name - this works fine.  The problem is that
I don't care about the response messages coming back from the SQL port, but
they're all being suspended since there is nothing subscribed to them.

Is there a way I can set up some sort of "null" port for these messages to
be sent to?  For now I set up a file port that subscribes to them, but I
don't want to have to keep cleaning out a directory.

Thanks in advance for any help.

Sean Carpenter

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Try this:

http://www.gotdotnet.com/Community/...9C-239C7CFBE424


"Sean Carpenter" <stcarpenter2005@community.nospam> wrote in message
news:%23xRZXG4IGHA.516@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> I'm processing some messages using BizTalk 2004 using CBR (no
> orchestrations).  I have a SQL Send Port that is subscribed to incoming
> messages based on receive port name - this works fine.  The problem is
> that I don't care about the response messages coming back from the SQL
> port, but they're all being suspended since there is nothing subscribed to
> them.
>
> Is there a way I can set up some sort of "null" port for these messages to
> be sent to?  For now I set up a file port that subscribes to them, but I
> don't want to have to keep cleaning out a directory.
>
> Thanks in advance for any help.
>
> Sean Carpenter
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Sean,

> I'm processing some messages using BizTalk 2004 using CBR (no
> orchestrations).  I have a SQL Send Port that is subscribed to incoming
> messages based on receive port name - this works fine.  The problem is
> that I don't care about the response messages coming back from the SQL
> port, but they're all being suspended since there is nothing subscribed to
> them.
>
> Is there a way I can set up some sort of "null" port for these messages to
> be sent to?  For now I set up a file port that subscribes to them, but I
> don't want to have to keep cleaning out a directory.

Besides the NOPE adapter Greg suggested, my own null adapter should do the
trick:
http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/archives/000475.html


--
Tomas Restrepo
tomasr@mvps.org
http://www.winterdom.com/

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]