02-29-04 03:34 PM
Louwrens Parre wrote:
>
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:16:55 +0200, Thor Kottelin <thor@anta.net>
> wrote:
> This is the right site http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~lparre/
> About 5 years ago they said frames is bad. But with browser which we
> use now is no problem.
> I think you live in the wrong time, do you see much websites without
> frames?
Yes. I just checked my top ten referrers - none of them use frames. Not a
lot of frame-based sites rank high on Google.
Why do you think sites such as Google, Yahoo, AOL, Netscape, MSN and
AltaVista don't use frames?
> your site simple, just a few words with some simple html-tags. Thats
> the reason why you come through the validator.
>
> you still use netscape 1.1 ? ;-)
No, and that's not the point, since I don't usually make web sites just for
myself.
> And you did not answer my question!
You asked why <URL:http://loupa.dyndns.ws/> didn't work. I told you it
didn't work because the frameset was broken.
<URL:http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~lparre/> works for me. Besides, this is not a
help desk.
Thor
--
http://thorweb.anta.net/
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|