Can't get config reply from komite or anybody else, only panta still
works.  What is going on anymore?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:51:46 +0100 (CET), George Orwell
<nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:

>Can't get config reply from komite or anybody else, only panta still
>works.  What is going on anymore?

Don't know: and having similar problems :-(
Maybe if Twisty-admin finally gets too pissed off with the usenet hassle
he'll swap his efforts from that to a nymserver? ;-)

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On 15 Feb 2006 23:53:33 -0000, Anonymous wrote:
>
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:51:46 +0100 (CET), George Orwell
><nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> 
>
>Don't know: and having similar problems :-(
>Maybe if Twisty-admin finally gets too pissed off with the usenet hassle
>he'll swap his efforts from that to a nymserver? ;-)
>


I sent a message through nym.alias.net on 2/16/2006 at 01:59:57 UTC
with no problem.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In alt.privacy.anon-server, Use-Author-Supplied-Address@[127.1] wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:51:46 +0100 (CET), George Orwell
><nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
> 
>
>Don't know: and having similar problems :-(
>Maybe if Twisty-admin finally gets too pissed off with the usenet hassle
>he'll swap his efforts from that to a nymserver? ;-)

Hmmmmm, not a bad idea.


Regards,
Relic Hunter

PGP Public Key available from key servers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBQ/ PqICgzHA75uZLXEQLhKQCfVLggjJD3bnCOYjwE3d
KdkbPQnlsAn2ri
cePVt0q94gss9Z6GYppRx1NK
=fVlp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

>Hmmmmm, not a bad idea.

This caught my eye too... minimal bandwidth requirements right? Anybody
willing to save us some hunting and provide RH and I a shortlist of
Windows (and Linux) packages that might be worth checking out?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:17:44 GMT  in NWSE1J4238764.5123032407@reece.net.au
moose <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
 
>
> This caught my eye too... minimal bandwidth requirements right? Anybody
> willing to save us some hunting and provide RH and I a shortlist of
> Windows (and Linux) packages that might be worth checking out?
>

Nymservers are only linux, AFAIK: I think they have to be linked to a workin
g
remailer, but if you are concerned about bandwidth problems, the remailer ca
n
be private (like komite?). Panta runs linux for the nymserver, but runs
windows-within-linux for Reliable - if I understand his previous postings?? 
I
hope he pops up with some help....

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 04:17:44 GMT  in NWSE1J4238764.5123032407@reece.net.au
> moose <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
> 
>
> Nymservers are only linux, AFAIK: I think they have to be linked to a work
ing
> remailer, but if you are concerned about bandwidth problems, the remailer 
can
> be private (like komite?). Panta runs linux for the nymserver, but runs
> windows-within-linux for Reliable - if I understand his previous postings?
? I
> hope he pops up with some help....

Why would he do that?  Why not just run mixmaster on linux?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article < b46a4633afbc65e35b0d3a7468db34da@mixmast
er.it>
George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
|
| 	Can't get config reply from komite or anybody else, only panta still
| works.  What is going on anymore?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

NAN still works rather well.

E.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.3

iQEVAwUBQ/UQBtAqdZr/ mrO9AQFurwf9FoBqsmltFp28J9zGrdE6MCGXYYXZ
m6Ns
b/xsKxwPETNUbrUNioP9YzwFVjp82CTCzL/xpWkuqHaM5nRx5SIjs1lPOljYgahN
 F2lYYzz+Scoro00cgeUsGvAm4WCN7gbdLNpYFKMK
PDfg/0s7w6a8j8mC3F+WsBUr
LuW1Bz4jtGY/ fAzPu8zPIbbDa2RGTBViYPe6OXrjXgupyTqTtVbD
gn5NxQFi/Ari
 G2484n70HVKkJ5W7l7Ze7MnXyJJCim84DpQVrfQX
oSqH++Wnp9JmFm48g1AeWP1T
 8EN1SShOUyJGPgd8mtjzLkCERmFSQVlCFUZNIbKN
USZ6vmGyN84YxA==
=Xj/6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In <DU4BMMFY38765.4278356481@reece.net.au>, NoReply@vnn.vn wrote:
>In article < b46a4633afbc65e35b0d3a7468db34da@mixmast
er.it>
>George Orwell <nobody@mixmaster.it> wrote:
>|
>| 	Can't get config reply from komite or anybody else, only panta still
>| works.  What is going on anymore?
>
>=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
>Signature: 0xFF9AB3BD E. Nigma <NoReply@vnn.vn>
>Date: Thu Feb 16 17:51:34 2006
>Status: OK  (Invalid)
>
>NAN still works rather well.
>
>E.
>=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====

only if you are willing to use pgp 2.6.x to use it, i am not.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On 17 Feb 2006 03:47:52 -0000, BiKiKii Admin
<Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, George Orwell wrote: 
>
>Pseudonym Remailer Reliability Statistics
>(reply-block test for each nymserver)
>
>  Subject: [STATS] Pseudonym Remailers  (BiKiKii)
>  From: BiKiKii-Stats
>  Newsgroups: alt.privacy.anon-server.stats
>
>  <http://xthost.info/bikikii/stats/nymstat.txt>
>  <http://bikikii-remailer.noneto.com/stats/nymstat.txt>
>
>Report generated daily at ~10:48 GMT
>

And that's great: but the problem with the unattended nymservers is with
creating new nyms or modifying old ones. Hod has a poor record here, and
komite has recently been troublesome; and NAN is no good for anyone using
modern PGP or GnuPG. We need more nymservers :-(

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]