03-01-06 12:45 PM
[ [url]http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311?page=comments#action_12368108[/
url] ]
Michael Watzek commented on JDO-311:
------------------------------------
Some inheritance configurations must specify property "jdo.tck.requiredOptio
ns" as shown below:
- inheritance1.conf: javax.jdo.option.mapping.JoinedTablePerClass.
- inheritance2.conf: javax.jdo.option.mapping.NonJoinedTablePerConcreteClass
, javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable.
- inheritance3.conf: javax.jdo.option.mapping.JoinedTablePerConcreteClass, j
avax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable.
> Inheritance3 : should check if the JDO implementation supports "javax.jdo.
option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable"
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-311
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311
> Project: JDO
> Type: Bug
> Components: tck20
> Versions: JDO 2 beta
> Reporter: Andy Jefferson
> Assignee: Michael Watzek
> Fix For: JDO 2 final
>
> The inheritance3 test should check whether PMF.supportedOptions contains "javax.jd
o.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable" before running the test. JPOX doesn't suppor
t this option yet the test still runs (and fails)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
|