[ [url]http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311?page=comments#action_12368259[/
url] ]

Michael Watzek commented on JDO-311:
------------------------------------

I agree with 1. above.
The removal of the package prefix in 2. above is consistent with other TCK t
est cases: All calls of method " printUnsupportedOptionalFeatureNotTested
" in
 TCK test classes pass a non-qualified classnames. For this reason, I propos
e to pass a non-qualified c
lassname here either, or to adapt the calls in other TCK test cases as well.
Please let me know how to proceed.


> Inheritance3 : should check if the JDO implementation supports "javax.jdo.
option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable"
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
>
>          Key: JDO-311
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311
>      Project: JDO
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: tck20
>     Versions: JDO 2 beta
>     Reporter: Andy Jefferson
>     Assignee: Michael Watzek
>      Fix For: JDO 2 final
>  Attachments: JDO-311.patch
>
> The inheritance3 test should check whether PMF.supportedOptions contains "javax.jd
o.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable" before running the test. JPOX doesn't suppor
t this option yet the test still runs (and fails)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]