I regualarly update stats for mixmaster (running as client), but the chains 
it
uses seem to ignore the uptime recorded. I have MINREL set at 98% and RELFIN
AL
at 99%, but have had nodes chosen with stats as low as 65%.
Using mixmaster 3.0b under linux, stats source = bikikii.
mlist is updating; is there a format issue with different stats sources?
Anyone any other ideas?

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <L4X7JR3038779.5042361111@twistycreek.com>
TwistyCreek <anon@comments.header> wrote:
>
> I regualarly update stats for mixmaster (running as client), but the chain
s it
> uses seem to ignore the uptime recorded. I have MINREL set at 98% and RELF
INAL
> at 99%, but have had nodes chosen with stats as low as 65%.
> Using mixmaster 3.0b under linux, stats source = bikikii.
> mlist is updating; is there a format issue with different stats sources?
> Anyone any other ideas?

You are joking, right? Bikikii for stats? The shitiest stats there are?

Get your XXX over to http://www.noreply.org/ and look. Bikikii is XXXXed up 
big time.
The worst set of stats of everyone. Bikikii shouldn't be rated a pinger. The
 mailer is XXXXed up and the pinger is worse.

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]