Eliminating the X-No-Archive header resulted in a perfect
post/reply with 1.0.9.5.

I should mention that I had the X-No-Archive header
permanently clicked using the Special/Custom headers:
*X-No-Archive: yes

I had other special headers, but clicked them off
in the custom tab for posting.

This is being posted via a new installation of XNews
using News2Remail 1.0.9.5 and mix29b39 (I have no
custom headers, and no X-No-Archive set).

Incidentally, what was the purpose of running News2Remail -S  ?

Persona

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <YIIE1P2U38780.8706712963@twistycreek.com>,
anon@comments.header says...
> Eliminating the X-No-Archive header resulted in a perfect
> post/reply with 1.0.9.5.
>
> I should mention that I had the X-No-Archive header
> permanently clicked using the Special/Custom headers:
> *X-No-Archive: yes
>
> I had other special headers, but clicked them off
> in the custom tab for posting.
>
> This is being posted via a new installation of XNews
> using News2Remail 1.0.9.5 and mix29b39 (I have no
> custom headers, and no X-No-Archive set).

I think if you try 1.0.9.6 with x-no-archive or custom headers it will
be fine.

>
> Incidentally, what was the purpose of running News2Remail -S  ?

It was an attempt to process the mix pool using the mixpath env var that
news2remail uses and not the one in the registry.

/steve
--
Cotse.Net Privacy Service
Your Shield From The Internet
http://www.cotse.net

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <MPG.1e74259d36d9e2d59896a2@news.newsreader.com>
Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm.com.bogus> wrote:
>
> In article <YIIE1P2U38780.8706712963@twistycreek.com>,
> anon@comments.header says... 
>
> I think if you try 1.0.9.6 with x-no-archive or custom headers it will
> be fine.

Thanks - for everything.
> 
>
> It was an attempt to process the mix pool using the mixpath env var that
> news2remail uses and not the one in the registry.
>
> /steve
> --

I didn't try it, but should I, or does it not work?

Persona

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <MRQPP2D738780.9584722222@twistycreek.com>,
anon@comments.header says... 
>
> I didn't try it, but should I, or does it not work?

To be honest, I don't know if it will work for you, but it should.
Basically all it does is run mix -S from within news2remail.  By doing
that it should ignore the reg entry mixpath and use the one you entered
in the config (ie. instead of mix-S sending the message to QS dir
because the mixpath in the registry points there, sending it SMTP as per
the news2remail mix path and config, all without juggling .reg imports).

I see from the other posts that 1.0.9.6 seems to be working fine for you
now in terms of headers, etc.

/steve
--
Cotse.Net Privacy Service
Your Shield From The Internet
http://www.cotse.net

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 00:14:52 -0500, Stephen K. Gielda
<steve@packetderm.com.bogus> wrote:

>In article <MRQPP2D738780.9584722222@twistycreek.com>,
>anon@comments.header says... 
>
>To be honest, I don't know if it will work for you, but it should.
>Basically all it does is run mix -S from within news2remail.  By doing
>that it should ignore the reg entry mixpath and use the one you entered
>in the config (ie. instead of mix-S sending the message to QS dir
>because the mixpath in the registry points there, sending it SMTP as per
>the news2remail mix path and config, all without juggling .reg imports).
>
>I see from the other posts that 1.0.9.6 seems to be working fine for you
>now in terms of headers, etc.

All it does for me is return "Notice: Checking for old parts." and
returs to the DOS prompt.


--
Guest

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <DGMR9KXN38781.5686689815@reece.net.au>, guest@cotse.invalid
says...
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 00:14:52 -0500, Stephen K. Gielda
> <steve@packetderm.com.bogus> wrote:
> 
>
> All it does for me is return "Notice: Checking for old parts." and
> returs to the DOS prompt.

That means it ran, is your spool dir empty now?

/steve
--
Cotse.Net Privacy Service
Your Shield From The Internet
http://www.cotse.net

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 01:01:06 -0500, Stephen K. Gielda
<steve@packetderm.com.bogus> wrote:

>In article <DGMR9KXN38781.5686689815@reece.net.au>, guest@cotse.invalid
>says... 
>
>That means it ran, is your spool dir empty now?

It was empty when I ran it. I was expecting it to run News2Remail as
per normal and then run mix -S from within News2Remail when a message
was posted. No worries, I just misunderstood what you meant, which I
gather is that it is the same as running mix -S  if the MixDir entry
points to the MixDir required for News2Remail.


--
Guest

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm.com.bogus> wrote in
news:MPG.1e743ddaaae11c0a9896a7@news.newsreader.com:

> In article <MRQPP2D738780.9584722222@twistycreek.com>,
> anon@comments.header says... 
>
> To be honest, I don't know if it will work for you, but it should.
> Basically all it does is run mix -S from within news2remail.  By doing
> that it should ignore the reg entry mixpath and use the one you
> entered in the config (ie. instead of mix-S sending the message to QS
> dir because the mixpath in the registry points there, sending it SMTP
> as per the news2remail mix path and config, all without juggling .reg
> imports).
>
> I see from the other posts that 1.0.9.6 seems to be working fine for
> you now in terms of headers, etc.
>
> /steve

I'm using 1.0.9.7 and it's working perfectly.

I'm still not sure what to do about news2remail -S.  Is this
something I run while News2remail is already running?
And it's equivalent to Mix -S?

Persona

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm.com.bogus> wrote in
news:MPG.1e743ddaaae11c0a9896a7@news.newsreader.com:

> In article <MRQPP2D738780.9584722222@twistycreek.com>,
> anon@comments.header says... 
>
> To be honest, I don't know if it will work for you, but it should.
> Basically all it does is run mix -S from within news2remail.  By doing
> that it should ignore the reg entry mixpath and use the one you
> entered in the config (ie. instead of mix-S sending the message to QS
> dir because the mixpath in the registry points there, sending it SMTP
> as per the news2remail mix path and config, all without juggling .reg
> imports).
>
> I see from the other posts that 1.0.9.6 seems to be working fine for
> you now in terms of headers, etc.
>
> /steve

I'm using 1.0.9.7 now, and it works perfectly.

Is News2Remail -S to be run while News2Remail is already running?
And that sends the mail?

Persona

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

In article <Z1Y5H1NK38781.8006712963@twistycreek.com>,
anon@comments.header says...
> Stephen K. Gielda <steve@packetderm.com.bogus> wrote in
> news:MPG.1e743ddaaae11c0a9896a7@news.newsreader.com:
> 
>
> I'm using 1.0.9.7 now, and it works perfectly.
>
> Is News2Remail -S to be run while News2Remail is already running?
> And that sends the mail?

That is the way it was set up, yes.  It's just a quick hack for now
though, eventually I'll work something better out, most likely by giving
n2r SMTP abilities.  Richard even offered to write a SMTP executable for
it, but he's already done enough, I'll probably code it right into n2r
eventually.  Right now I'm just bug fixing, I have too much on my plate
for this to become a full blown development project and the gui version
and new features will have to wait until I have free time again to play
around with code.

/steve
--
Cotse.Net Privacy Service
Your Shield From The Internet
http://www.cotse.net

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]