03-12-04 03:40 AM
OK, I should have paid more attention to that HRESULT (0x8004E003).
That error code means "You made a method call on a COM+ component that has
a transaction that has already aborted or in the process of aborting."
It sounds like there was an earlier failure on the page or in the pipeline
that is being silently ignored (though pipeline failures should cause an
event to be logged if you have the Commerce Event Logging COM+ component
configured correctly). You will need to run your code under the script
debugger or VS.NET and check Error.Code at each step to see where it's
failing. Perhaps you have an "On Error Resume Next" somewhere you should
not?
HTH
-djm
--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
You assume all risk for your use. © 2004 Microsoft Corporation. All rights
reserved.
--------------------
From: "Mike Loffland" <mloffland@cox.net>
References: <Oo9Ut$jAEHA.3256@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
<7DrZEzsAEHA.604@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
Subject: Re: Method '~' of object '~' failed - MDAC 2.8 ?
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:17:34 -0600
Lines: 75
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <#LX277vAEHA.2348@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.commerceserver.general
NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-97-9-162.ok.ok.cox.net 68.97.9.162
Path: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.commerceserver.general:13347
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.commerceserver.general
Line 180 on payment.asp is:
Call mscsOrderGrp.SaveAsOrder()
When researching the "Method '~' of object '~' failed" error on google...
all the talk was about synchronizing MDACs on production and test. I am
running "MDAC 2.7 refresh" on the test server and "MDAC 2.8" on the
production
server.
I am running CS2K2 sp2... classic ASP. The site was built on top of the
retail solution site. Everything else on the production site works except
for this final stage of the order process.
There is nothing in the event viewer... and there are only 2 applications
(the main site, and the management site). There are only 2 rows in the
"Sites" table in the admin DB.
Mike
"David Messner [MSFT]" <davidme@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7DrZEzsAEHA.604@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl...
> We have tested CS2002 SP2 with MDAC 2.8 - this is a supported
> configuration. The only known issue is when you have > 8 applications in
> your admin DB. What makes you think the problem is related to MDAC 2.8?
>
> Any other clues? Anything in the event log? What is at line 180 of your
> payments.asp? Is this CS2002 or CS2000? What SP level?
>
> -djm
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> You assume all risk for your use. © 2004 Microsoft Corporation. All
rights
> reserved.
> --------------------
> From: "Mike Loffland" <mloffland@cox.net>
> Subject: Method '~' of object '~' failed - MDAC 2.8 ?
> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 17:30:04 -0600
> Lines: 14
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
> Message-ID: <Oo9Ut$jAEHA.3256@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
> Newsgroups: microsoft.public.commerceserver.general
> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-97-9-162.ok.ok.cox.net 68.97.9.162
> Path:
>
cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA06.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA05.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP0
> 8.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
> Xref: cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl microsoft.public.commerceserver.general:13332
> X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.commerceserver.general
>
> I am getting the following error...
>
> Error Type:
> CS_Req (0x8004E003)
> Method '~' of object '~' failed
> /main/include/payment.asp, line 180
>
> Is there anyway to revert back to MDAC 2.7? Microsoft has an article about
> the MDAC checker utility... they say you can rollback to a previous
version
> of MDAC. But I don't see this option anywhere in the checker utility.
>
> I am running 2000 server.
>
>
>
[ Post a follow-up to this message ]
| 
